Pemanfaatan Teknologi Openai Dall-E 2 dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas Desainer Grafis pada Komunitas Desain Grafis Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/jbkd.v1i2.1916Keywords:
OpenAI DALL- E 2, Kreativitas, Desain GrafisAbstract
OpenAI DALL-E 2 untuk meningkatkan kreativitas desainer grafis dalam komunitas desain grafis di Indonesia. Menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, 15 anggota aktif dari komunitas desain grafis yang telah memanfaatkan teknologi ini, diwawancarai secara mendalam. Hasilnya mengungkap potensi teknologi dalam merangsang ek-splorasi kreatif dengan menghasilkan variasi-desain yang beragam dan unik ber-dasarkan deskripsi yang diberikan. Selain itu, teknologi ini juga meningkatkan efisiensi dan kecepatan proses desain, memungkinkan desainer fokus pada pengem-bangan ide dan konsep desain. Meski demikian, tantangan seperti keterbatasan pemahaman deskripsi pengguna dan isu etika serta hak kekayaan intelektual, perlu diperhatikan. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pengembangan panduan penggunaan yang sesuai dan kolaborasi aktif antara desainer untuk memaksimalkan manfaat teknologi ini. Dengan memahami keterbatasan dan mengatasi tantangan tersebut, teknologi OpenAI DALL-E 2 dapat menjadi alat berharga dalam memperkaya krea-tivitas desainer grafis dan meningkatkan kualitas desain grafis di Indonesia.
References
Abrudan, D. B. (2020). The challenge of young Romanian designers: Creativity in business. Industria Textila, 71(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.35530/IT.071.03.1818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35530/IT.071.03.1818
Alvarez, A. (2018). Fostering creativity in the mixed-initiative evolutionary dungeon designer. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3235765.3235815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3235765.3235815
Chen, C. W. J. (2019). From Teacher-Designer to Student-Researcher: a Study of Attitude Change Regarding Creativity in STEAM Education by Using Makey Makey as a Platform for Human-Centred Design Instrument. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0010-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0010-6
Chulvi, V. (2020a). Natural elements in the designer’s work environment influence the creativity of their results. Journal of Building Engineering, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101033
Chulvi, V. (2020b). The effect of nature on designers’ creativity, according to their personality profile. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(2), 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.03.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.03.036
Chulvi, V. (2022). How the type of methodology used, when working in a natural environment, affects the designer’s creativity. Research in Engineering Design, 33(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-022-00387-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-022-00387-y
de Wet, A. J. C. (2020). Towards enterprising design: a creativity framework supporting the fluency, flexibility and flow of student fashion designers. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13(3), 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1818851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1818851
Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid Intelligence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00595-2
García-García, C. (2019). Does the work environment affect designers’ creativity during the creative phase depending on their personality profile? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100578
Grammenos, D. (2018). Future designers: Introducing creativity, design thinking & design to children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.10.002
Gusikhin, O., & Rychtyckyj, N. (2007). Intelligent Systems in the Automotive Industry: Applications and Trends. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-006-0063-1
Ho, C. (2023). Exploring Creativity of Designers in Children’s Library Navigation APP Design with Design Thinking Workshop. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594441.3594470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3594441.3594470
Kadyjrova, L. H. (2020). Project thinking as the basis of design creativity: Content and features of its development among bachelor-designers. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(8), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n8p1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n8p1
Koronis, G. (2018a). Impact of design briefs on creative outcomes: A factorial study on student designers’ creativity. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, E and PDE 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0328
Koronis, G. (2018b). The impact of design briefs on creativity: A study on measuring student designers outcomes. Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, 5, 2461–2472. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0328
Leclair, M. (2023). The Atmospherics of Creativity: Affective and spatial materiality in a designer’s studio. Organization Studies, 44(5), 807–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221080141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221080141
Lee, J. (2019). Co-Design Education Based on the Changing Designer’s Role and Changing Creativity. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 38(2), 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12204
Lee, J. H. (2021). Using an Immersive Virtual Reality Design Tool to Support Cognitive Action and Creativity: Educational Insights from Fashion Designers. Design Journal, 24(4), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2021.1912902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2021.1912902
Liu, X. (2021). Use interactive media to enhance creativity of designers by stimulating the senses in the context of art design education. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 3319–3328. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.593
Liu, Y. C. (2020). Design exploration predicts designer creativity: a deep learning approach. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 14(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-020-09569-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-020-09569-7
Plantec, Q. (2019). Inventions and scientific discoveries: Impact of designers’ collaborations on creativity. An analysis towards fixation effects. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2019, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.19
Pollok, P. (2021). Knowledge diversity and team creativity: How hobbyists beat professional designers in creating novel board games. Research Policy, 50(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104174
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2009). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach.
Saliminamin, S. (2019). Sources of creativity stimulation for designing the next generation of technical systems: correlations with R&D designers’ performance. Research in Engineering Design, 30(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0299-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0299-2
Son, K. (2020). Ambiguous vs. Concrete: Identifying the Effect of Design References with Various Level of Details on Designer’s Creativity in the Early Design Phase. RE: Anthropocene, Design in the Age of Humans - Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2020, 2, 589–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2020.2.587
Starkey, E. (2018). When are designers willing to take risks? How concept creativity and prototype fidelity influence perceived risk. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 7. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86092
Starkey, E. M. (2019). When Are Designers Willing to Take Risks? How Concept Creativity and Prototype Fidelity Influence Perceived Risk. Journal of Mechanical Design, 141(3). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042339
Tare, M. (2023). “We’re Hinged. They’re Not. It’s in that Space that Creativity Happens:” Adult co-designers’ perspectives on designing technology with children. Proceedings of IDC 2023 - 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference: Rediscovering Childhood, 574–577. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585088.3593902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3585088.3593902
Teng, J. (2022). Domain-specific and Domain-general Creativity Differences between Expert and Novice Designers. Creativity Research Journal, 34(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1997175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1997175
Yang, J. (2022). Knowledge: the good, the bad, and the ways for designer creativity. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(12), 945–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2022.2161300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2022.2161300
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
