Tantangan Penyelesaian Konflik Internasional yang Dilematik mengenai Hak Veto dalam Dewan Keamanan PBB (Studi kasus Palestina dengan Israel)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i2.2373Keywords:
Conflict Resolution, Veto Power, Security Council, United Nations, Palestine, IsraelAbstract
This research aims to explore and contribute to the understanding of the misuse of the veto power in resolutions for international conflict resolution. The focus is on describing the challenges arising from the use of the veto power in the UN Security Council, often prolonging conflicts without a definitive resolution. The research methodology employed is juridical normative with descriptive analysis, referring to provisions in the UN Charter and other reliable literature. The findings highlight that the abolition of the veto power in the UN Security Council could serve as a solution for more effective conflict resolution. Prolonged international conflicts result in significant losses, especially for civilians, while the UN, as the largest international organization, frequently fails to resolve these conflicts. The main issue lies in the rejection of resolutions by veto-wielding states, leading to the failure of these resolutions and the continuation of conflicts. Structural reforms within the UN are crucial to enhance its performance in conflict resolution to prevent further casualties. The unbridled use of the veto power, based on the geopolitical considerations of certain states, slows down the conflict resolution process. Additionally, the power disparity between veto-wielding states and other members contradicts the principle of sovereign equality enshrined in the UN Charter. Therefore, clear criteria must be established for the use of the veto power in peace resolutions to ensure that conflict resolution is not hindered by purely geopolitical interests.
References
Adwani, A. (2022). Eksistensi Indonesia Sebagai Anggota Tidak Tetap Dewan Keamanan Pbb Dalam Mewujudkan Perdamaian Dan Keamanan Internasional. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v17i1.5346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v17i1.5346
Afrilianti, D., Ardianto, B., & Pebrianto, D. Y. (2021). Pengapusan Hak Veto Dalam Rangka Reformasi Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa. Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 2(2), 210–234. https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v2i2.12114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v2i2.12114
Christopher, F., Godknows, N., Uki, I. E., Seaman, O. L., & Harcourt, E. H. (2021). The UN Security Council Permanent Membership: The Troubling Trend of Expansion and Hegemony. Open Journal of Political Science, 11(02), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2021.112021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2021.112021
Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empris. Prenada Media.
Fatmawati. (2020). Perubahan Politik Luar Negeri Rusia Terhadap Suriah Dalam Konflik Internal Suriah (2011 – 2017). Jdp (Jurnal Dinamika Pemerintahan), 3(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.36341/jdp.v3i1.1192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36341/jdp.v3i1.1192
Ganes Harpendya, Sumantri, S. H., & Wahyudi, B. (2022). Pendidikan perdamaian: sebuah urgensi di tengah maraknya konflik sosial berdimensi suku, agama, ras, dan antar-golongan di indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 21(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.21009/jimd.v21i2.26488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/jimd.v21i2.26488
Kasim, A., Suhariyanto, D., Ramdhani, W., Rahim, E. I., & Danial, D. (2024). Scenarios For Limiting The Veto of Permanent Members Of The United Nations Security Council. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(1), 499. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i1.4163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i1.4163
Kroes, R. (2014). The Paradox of American Global Power. Society, 51(5), 492–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9815-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9815-9
Malcom. (2013). Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Margareth, H. (2017). Sistem Hukum dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia. Экономика Региона, 32.
Muntasyir, M. B. (2022). Peran Aktif Amerika Serikat Era Joe Biden dalam Konflik Palestina dan Israel. Jurnal PIR : Power in International Relations, 7(1), 01. https://doi.org/10.22303/pir.7.1.2022.01-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22303/pir.7.1.2022.01-12
Neack, L. (2018). Studying Foreign Policy Comparatively Cases Analiysis. In Cases and Analysis. https://zlib.pub/book/studying-foreign-policy-comparatively-cases-and-analysis-5ioe14b74dd0
Ratu, S. A., Resnawati, S., & Sitamala, A. (2022). Status Hukum Resolusi Dewan Keamanan PBB Dalam Ranah Hukum Nasional Indonesia. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v6i1.4553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v6i1.4553
Singh, R. (2023). US veto of Gaza ceasefire: Why only five countries have veto power in the UN Security Council. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/everyday-explainers/permanent-five-veto-power-unsc-explained-9071707/
Teguh, M. A. (2021). Relevansi Hak Veto PBB dengan Prinsip Kedaulatan yang Dianut oleh PBB. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(1), 149–149. https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/2307
Thrall, N. (2014). How the West Chose War in Gaza. In The New York Times (Issue July, pp. 1–3). https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/18/opinion/gaza-and-israel-the-road-to-war-paved-by-the-west.html
Wirajaya, A. C. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Palestina Dan Israel Menurut Hukum Internasional (Study Kasus Perampasan Wilayah Palestina Di Israel). Lex Et Societatis, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v8i4.30909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v8i4.30909
Yadlin, A., & Evental, U. (2024). Why Israel Slept The War in Gaza and the Search for Security. In Foreign Affairs (Vol. 103, Issue 1, pp. 20–29).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Wendra, Andri Sutrisno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
