Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Secara Alternatif Melewati Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i1.2050Keywords:
Arbitrase, Dispute resolution, Badan Arbitrase Nasional IndonesiaAbstract
Peaceful resolution of disputes is the main goal in the modern legal system. One form of peaceful resolution, namely arbitration, is recognized as an effective way to resolve disputes firmly and bindingly. Arbitration is part of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), which includes various methods of resolution outside of court or litigation. In the context of resolving default disputes, the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) is an efficient option. This research aims to analyze the role and benefits of arbitration in handling default disputes, especially those related to BANI. The research method used is normative legal research by collecting and analyzing secondary data such as laws, regulations, arbitration decisions and related literature. The research results show that the default dispute resolution process through BANI involves several steps, including arbitration selection, trial process, and final decision. The advantages of resolving default disputes through BANI include speed, legal certainty through arbitration awards, and the diversity of arbitrators who can provide different points of view in resolving disputes. Based on research findings, the decision of the Denpasar District Court Class I A Number 3/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Dps is based on Article 3 of Law no. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. The judge stated that the District Court did not have the authority to decide disputes between two parties who were bound by an arbitration agreement. This shows that if a dispute occurs, the parties must resolve it through deliberation. If deliberations are unsuccessful, the resolution will be handed over to the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI).
References
Abdurrasyid, H. P. (2002). Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. PT. Fikahati Aneska.
Andriansyah, M. (2014). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Oleh Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Cita Hukum., 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.1472
Ariprabowo, T., & Nazriyah, R. (2018). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase oleh Pengadilan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(4), 701. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1441
Faisal, M., & Basniwati, A. D. (2017). Peranan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Jatiswara, 2(4), 279–289.
Gunarsa, S. M. (2019). Kekuatan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Terkait Keberatan dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Sebagai Alternative Dispute Resolution dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen. Sasi, 25(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i2.197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i2.197
Harahap, M. Y. (2004). Arbitrase Ditinjau dari Rv, Peraturan Prosedur Bani ICSID dll. Sinar Grafika.
Khasanah, K. (2018). Problematika Hukum Implementasi Sifat Final dan Binding Putusan yang Dibuat oleh BASYARNAS dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 1(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i1.1685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i1.1685
Lestari, R. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Bisnis Yang Memuat Klausula Arbitrase. Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v3i2.1440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v3i2.1440
Maharani, N. M. I., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Para Pihak Yang Telah Terikat Dalam Perjanjian Arbitrase (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar). Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(1), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.1.1615.119-123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.1.1615.119-123
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum (1st ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
Memi, C. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kompetensi Absolut Antara Arbitrase Dan Pengadilan. Jurnal Yudisial, 10(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v10i2.142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v10i2.142
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan tentang Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan, POJK No. 61 Tahun 2020, LN Tahun 2020 No. 290, TLN No. 6599.
Purwosutjipto. (1988). Pengertian Pokok Hukum Dagang. Jambatan, Jakarta. In Soemali, L. N. Y. (2010). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Arbitrase Dalam Investasi Perdagangan. Jurnal Hukum, XVIII(18).
Rasyid, P. A. (2011). Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa: Suatu Pengantar. Fikahati Aneska.
Situmorang, M. (2017). Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17(4), 309. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.v17.309-320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.V17.309-320
T, R. (2011). Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat (2nd ed.). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Usmani, R. (2012). Mediasi di Pengadilan : Dalam Teori dan Praktik. Sinar Grafika.
Wardana, A. A., & Imanullah, B. N. (2022). RETRACTED: Arbitrase Online sebagai Bentuk Penyelesaian Sengketa yang Efektif dan Berkepastian Hukum dalam Fintech. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 6(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v6i1.491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v6i1.491
Widjaja, G., & Adrian, M. (2008). Seri Aspek Hukum Dalam Bisnis: Peran Pengadilan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Yusriana, Y. (2021). Analisis Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi Terhadap Konflik Antara Nasabah Dengan Pihak Bank. Juripol, 4(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.33395/juripol.v4i1.11035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33395/juripol.v4i1.11035
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dewi Ratrika Rinupa Sejati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
