Tanggung Jawab Hukum PT. Gojek Indonesia terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Identitas Driver dalam Layanan Go-Send di Kota Serang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.3782Keywords:
Consumer Protection, Legal Responsibility, Go-Send Service, Driver Identity VerificationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of PT. Gojek Indonesia regarding the mismatch of driver identity in the Go-Send delivery service in Serang City, based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The main issue examined is the loss or non-delivery of goods due to drivers whose identities do not match the information displayed in the application. The research employs an empirical juridical approach, collecting primary data through interviews and secondary data through literature studies. The findings reveal that PT. Gojek holds legal liability to compensate consumers for their losses, either in the form of money or equivalent goods, as stipulated under consumer protection regulations. However, in practice, the dispute resolution process has not been effective, as consumers have not yet received clear compensation. Consequently, some consumers have escalated the matter to consumer protection agencies. The study concludes that PT. Gojek must improve identity verification procedures for its drivers and enhance the dissemination of information regarding claim mechanisms to users. Additionally, it is recommended to implement a mandatory-read agreement feature to ensure that consumers understand their rights. These efforts are expected to strengthen consumer trust and the overall credibility of Go-Send services.
References
Amajida, F. D. (2016). Kreativitas Digital Dalam Masyarakat Risiko Perkotaan: Studi Tentang Ojek Online “Go-Jek” Di Jakarta. Informasi, 46(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v46i1.9657
Amalia, A., Gunawan, D., & Nasution, K. (2021). Sentiment analysis of GO-JEK services quality using Multi-Label Classification. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1830(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1830/1/012003
Arif, D. A., Hidayati, R., & Ashsyarofi, H. L. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Mitra Driver Gojek Dalam Transaksi Online Orderan Fiktif. Dinamika, 28(17), 5713–5725. https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jdh/article/view/16810
Avelyne, D. M. (2021). Penerapan E-Notary Dalam Transaksi Elektronik Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (Ite). Spektrum Hukum, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v18i1.2773
Bagiastra, D. P. (2023). DAMPAK UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (UU ITE) TERHADAP PERUBAHAN HUKUM DAN SOSIAL DALAM MASYARAKAT. Jurnal Yusthima, 3(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.36733/yusthima.v3i1.6581
Fuad, M. N. (2019). Kepastian Hukum Bagi Konsumen Terhadap Kerugian Yang Ditimbulkan Oleh Driver Go-Jek Berdasarkan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Litigasi, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v19i1.1091
Halimah, L., & Hidayah, Y. (2024). PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM DALAM KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT PADA BIDANG POLITIK: PERSPEKTIF PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN DAN KETERLIBATAN MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PENERAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (UU ITE) DI INDONESIA. LITIGASI, 25(2), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v25i2.18489
Lathif, N. (2017). Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana / Alat Untuk Memperbaharui Atau Merekayasa Masyarakat. Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33751/.v3i1.402
Mahfiroh, R. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Barang Kiriman Konsumen Pengguna Jasa Go-Send Instant Courier Melalui Tokopedia. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss1.art15
Mar’ati, N. C. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Dan Harga Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Jasa Transportasi Ojek Online (Studi Pada Konsumen Gojek Di Surabaya). Administrative Law Journal, 60, 53–77.
Martin, L. E. and A. D. (2014). An introduction to empirical legal research. In International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
Muthiah, A. (2017). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha kepada Konsumen tentang Keamanan Pangan dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Dan Investasi, 7(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v7i2.712
Pratama, M. E. R., & Sutrisno, S. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kurir Jika Terjadi Ketidaksesuaian Pengiriman Barang Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Cash on Delivery (COD). Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v2i2.16304
Priyono, E. A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Perjanjian E-Commerce. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 4(1), 428–438. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dplr/article/view/5105
RENDY SAPUTRA. (2016). Kedudukan Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia. http://www.myanmarinsider.com/rice-husk-a-useful-by-product-for-rice-growing-countries/
Salasa Anastasia, D. (2023). Urgensi Pembentukan Hukum Fintech Untuk Memberi Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Konsumen Dalam Pinjaman Online. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(02), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i02.227
Santoso, E. (2018). Pengaruh Era Globalisasi Terhadap Hukum Bisnis Di Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=7OZeDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false
Sari, N. I., & Nainggolan, R. P. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Harga, Pelayanan, Dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Penggunaan Jasa Ojek Online “Gojek” Pada Mahasiswa Stie Jayakarta Tahun 2024. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan Jayakarta, 6(01), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.53825/japjayakarta.v6i01.293
Tektona, R. I. (2016). PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DALAM KONTRAK TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE BERDASARKAN HUKUM PERDAGANGAN INTERNASIONAL. JURNAL SUPREMASI, 6(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.30957/supremasi.v6i2.391
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rachawanti Puspita Dewi, Dede Agus, Rully Syahrul Mucharom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
