Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Korban Yang Melakukan Pembelaan Terpaksa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.4011Keywords:
Legal Protection, Self-Defense, Law Enforcement, Criminal Liability, Legal CultureAbstract
This research aims to provide an overview of Legal Protection for Victims Who Act in Self-Defense. In this study, the author employs a normative juridical approach. The theoretical framework used is the Theory of Factors Influencing Law Enforcement, by examining the obstacles that affect law enforcement in cases where victims attempt to defend themselves. The secondary data used in this research is sourced from various materials such as statutory regulations and legal journals. The findings show that the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) regulates self-defense (noodweer) and excessive self-defense (noodweer exces) as stipulated in Article 49 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the KUHP. Article 49 serves as the legal basis for providing legal protection to individuals who act in self-defense. Under this Article, a criminal act committed may be exempted from criminal liability, allowing the perpetrator to be free from any legal charges, provided that the elements of self-defense are fulfilled. Obstacles in law enforcement for cases involving self-defense include unclear legal provisions, limited understanding among law enforcement officers of the noodweer concept, lack of supporting infrastructure such as CCTV, low public awareness in reporting crimes, and a weak legal culture. Of all the factors, law enforcement is considered the most dominant because the central role of officers in enforcing regulations professionally, objectively, and fairly is crucial in determining the true realization of justice.
References
Azis, A., Hehanussa, D. J. A., & Supusepa, R. (2024). (2024). Penghentian Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Dalam Kaitan Dengan Pembelaan Terpaksa. Bacarita Law Journal, 122–139.
Brown, P. A. (2008). Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education CJNSE = Revue canadienne des jeunes chercheures et chercheurs en éducation : RCJCÉ. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education/ Revue Canadienne Des Jeunes Chercheures et Chercheurs En Éducation, 1(1). https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjnse/article/view/30395
Effendy, A., & Magno, N. G. P. (2024). Penerapan Hukuman Mati Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Sisi Hak Asasi Manusia. Hukum Dan Demokrasi (HD), 24(3). https://doi.org/10.61234/hd.v24i3.66
Halawa, M., Munawir, Z., & Hidayani, S. (2020). Penerapan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Dengan Sengaja Merampas Nyawa Orang Lain (Studi Kasus Nomor Putusan 616/Pid.B/2015/PN. Lbp). JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v2i1.228
Heatubun, L. H. R., Sabila S, M., Risqullah H, M. I. M., & Irawan, F. (2022). Tindakan Noodweer Exces Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Sebagai Bentuk Mempertahankan Diri, Harta, Dan Kehormatan. Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science, 2(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v2i2.176
Laitera, Y. Y., Sinurat, A., & Medan, K. K. (2024). (2024). KAJIAN YURIDIS TENTANG PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN DALAM PEMBUNUHAN KARENA PEMBELAAN TERPAKSA YANG MELAMPAUI BATAS. JURNAL HUKUM PROYURIS.
Mallarangeng, A. B. (2024). Komparasi Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Islam Terhadap Pembelaan Terpaksa dalam Kasus Pemerkosaan. Legal Journal of Law. https://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/45%0Ahttps://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/download/45/92
Niffari, H. (2020). PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI HAK ASASI MANUSIA ATAS PERLINDUNGAN DIRI PRIBADI Suatu Tinjauan Komparatif Dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Negara Lain. Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis (Selisik), 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.35814/selisik.v6i1.1699
Renrusun, H. J. M., & Simangunsong, F. (2023). PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA OLEH KEPOLISIAN DENGAN ALASAN PEMBELAAN TERPAKSA (Noodweer). Seminar Nasional Hukum Dan Pancasila, 2(9), 142–152.
Rizal, M. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Upaya Pembelaan Diri Korban Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14545856
Saidah, I. H. wahidin. (2020). MELAMPAUI BATAS (NOODWEER EXCES) DALAM MEMBELA DIRI (Studi Perbandingan Antara Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukum Positif). In Mazahibuna (Vol. 2, p. 7). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ybqng
Tarigan, M., & Naibaho, N. (2020). PERBUATAN MEMBERIKAN GANJA KEPADA ORANG LAIN SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENGOBATAN DITINJAU DARI SIFAT MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM HUKUM PIDANA (STUDI KASUS FIDELIS ARIE SUDEWARTO). Riau Law Journal, 4(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v4i1.7834
Utami, P. (2024). Analisis Pembelaan Terpaksa Korban Tindak Pidana Pembegalan yang Dijadikan Tersangka Menurut Tinjauan Viktimologi. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14241908
Utoyo, M. (2019). Pelaku Pembunuhan yang Membela Diri dalam Mempertahankan Kehormatan dan Harta. Pranata Hukum, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v8i2.139
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rouf Fadhlullah, Diah Gustiniati Maulani, Dona Raisa Monica, Eko Raharjo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
