Hukum Tata Negara dan Hubungannya dengan Ilmu Lainnya
(Constitutional Law and its Relationship with Other Sciences)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2589Keywords:
Hukum Tata Negara, Hubungan Indisipliner, Ilmu NegaraAbstract
Hukum Tata Negara (HTN) merupakan disiplin ilmu yang mengatur struktur kenegaraan, hubungan antarstruktur organ negara, dan interaksi antara negara dengan warga negara. Seiring perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan dinamika politik, HTN tidak dapat berdiri sendiri dan membutuhkan integrasi dengan disiplin ilmu lain seperti Ilmu Negara, Ilmu Politik, dan Hukum Administrasi Negara (HAN). Permasalahan utama dalam penelitian ini adalah memahami bagaimana hubungan antara HTN dengan bidang hukum lainnya, serta bagaimana interaksi ini mempengaruhi penataan negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, mengandalkan studi kepustakaan untuk mengumpulkan data dari buku, jurnal, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan sumber relevan lainnya. Analisis dilakukan dengan mengkaji konsep, teori, dan doktrin hukum yang berkaitan dengan HTN dan disiplin ilmu terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa HTN berfungsi sebagai konkretisasi dari teori-teori Ilmu Negara dan sangat dipengaruhi oleh dinamika politik yang diatur dalam Ilmu Politik. Selain itu, HTN dan HAN memiliki hubungan simbiotik dimana HTN menyediakan kerangka hukum dan HAN memastikan operasionalisasi yang efektif dari badan-badan negara. Penelitian ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya pendekatan interdisipliner dalam memahami dan mengembangkan HTN untuk menjawab tantangan kenegaraan modern.
References
Arnull, A. (2023). Accountability and legitimacy in the European Union. Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union, 1–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199255603.003.0001
Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Kedudukan dan Peranan Hukum Tata Negara dalam Pembangunan.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Rajawali Press.
Baude, W. (2019). Constitutional liquidation. Stanford Law Review, 71(1).
Beaman, L. G. (2020). The transition of religion to culture in law and public discourse. The Transition of Religion to Culture in Law and Public Discourse, 1–181. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003007319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003007319-1
Blokker, P. (2019a). Populism as a constitutional project. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(2), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz028
Blokker, P. (2019b). Populist Counter-Constitutionalism, Conservatism, and Legal Fundamentalism. European Constitutional Law Review, 15(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961900035X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961900035X
Bourchier, D. M. (2019). Two Decades of Ideological Contestation in Indonesia: From Democratic Cosmopolitanism to Religious Nationalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1590620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1590620
Brinks, D. M. (2020). The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America. The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America, 1–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776608.001
Bugarič, B. (2019). Central Europe’s descent into autocracy: A constitutional analysis of authoritarian populism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(2), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz032
Choudhry, S. (2023a). Bridging comparative politics and comparative constitutional law: Constitutional design in divided societies. Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation?, 3–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199535415.003.0001
Choudhry, S. (2023b). Constitutional design for divided societies: Integration or accommodation? Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation?, 1–496.
Daly, T. G. (2019). Democratic Decay: Conceptualising an Emerging Research Field. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(1), 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00086-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00086-2
Dimyati, K. (2021). Indonesia as a legal welfare state: A prophetic-transcendental basis. Heliyon, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865
Dixon, R. (2021). Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: Legal globalization and the subversion of liberal democracy. Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: Legal Globalization and the Subversion of Liberal Democracy, 1–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.003.0001
Drinóczi, T. (2019). Illiberal constitutionalism: The case of Hungary and Poland. German Law Journal, 20(8), 1140–1166. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.83
Drinóczi, T. (2020). COVID-19 in Hungary and Poland: extraordinary situation and illiberal constitutionalism. Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8(1), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1782109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1782109
Epps, D. (2019). How to save the supreme court. Yale Law Journal, 129(1), 148–206. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3288958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3288958
Filippi, P. De. (2020). Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance. Technology in Society, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284
Guaninta, M. W. S. (2014). Hukum Tata Negara. 8–13.
Kelemen, R. D. (2019). The uses and abuses of constitutional pluralism: Undermining the rule of law in the name of constitutional identity in Hungary and Poland. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 21, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2019.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2019.11
Lesaffer, R. (2019). European legal history: A cultural and political perspective. European Legal History: A Cultural and Political Perspective, 1–549. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107300866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107300866
Mumcuoğlu, E. (2021). Natural language processing in law: Prediction of outcomes in the higher courts of Turkey. Information Processing and Management, 58(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102684
Munn, M. (2023). The School of History: Athens in the Age of Socrates. The School of History: Athens in the Age of Socrates, 1–525.
Piersanti, V. (2021). Surrogacy and “procreative tourism”. What does the future hold from the ethical and legal perspectives? Medicina (Lithuania), 57(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010047
Sadurski, W. (2019). Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1
Seto, B. B. (2017). Makalah Hukum Tata Negara.
Skowronek, S. (2021). Phantoms of a beleaguered republic: The deep state and the unitary executive. Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and The Unitary Executive, 1–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197543085.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197543085.002.0001
Yang, D. (2020). Epidemiology of lung cancer and lung cancer screening programs in China and the United States. Cancer Letters, 468, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.10.009
Ziegler, M. (2020). Abortion and the Law in America: Roe V. Wade to the Present. Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present, 1–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108653138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108653138
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maulana Arfidata Reyhan, Irwan Triadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.