Analisis Perubahan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Konteks Pemilu 2024 Melalui Tinjauan Hukum Tata Negara: (Analysis of Changes in the Constitutional Court's Decision in The Context of the 2024 Elections Through a Review of Constitutional Law)

Silvi Aryana Paradita; Irwan Triadi

doi:10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2349

Authors

Silvi Aryana Paradita Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
Irwan Triadi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2349

Keywords:

Putusan, Pemilu, Mahkamah Konstitusi

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perubahan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dalam konteks pemilihan umum (pemilu) tahun 2024 dengan menggunakan pendekatan hukum tata negara. Keputusan-keputusan MK memiliki peran krusial dalam menentukan validitas pemilu dan melindungi prinsip-prinsip demokrasi yang mendasarinya. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan studi pustaka. Artikel ini melakukan tinjauan terhadap putusan-putusan MK dalam pemilu sebelumnya dan membandingkannya dengan konteks pemilu tahun 2024. Dalam analisis ini, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perubahan putusan MK akan diperhatikan, seperti perkembangan hukum, perubahan sosial, dan pergeseran politik yang mungkin terjadi seiring berjalannya waktu. Melalui tinjauan hukum tata negara, artikel ini juga akan mempertimbangkan pengaruh pemikiran konstitusionalis dan prinsip-prinsip hak asasi manusia dalam putusan MK terkait pemilu. Penelitian ini memperhatikan perubahan dalam interpretasi konstitusi oleh MK dan dampaknya terhadap proses pemilu. Hasil analisis ini diharapkan dapat memberikan pemahaman yang lebih baik tentang perubahan putusan MK dalam konteks pemilu 2024 dan implikasinya terhadap sistem demokrasi. Dengan memahami perubahan tersebut, para pemangku kepentingan dapat mengantisipasi dan merespons dengan tepat, yang pada gilirannya dapat meningkatkan integritas pemilu dan kepercayaan publik dalam proses demokrasi.

References

Amir, M. (2020). Keserentakan Pemilu 2024 yang Paling Ideal Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23(2), 115–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i2.41

Bibbins-Domingo, K. (2024). Health and the 2024 Elections Globally-A Call for Papers. JAMA, 331(7), 572. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.1055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.1055

Budiman, I. (2021). Customary forest managements and its challenges in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: An implication of constitutional court decision 2012. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 27(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.27.2.69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.27.2.69

Buser, A. (2021). Of Carbon Budgets, Factual Uncertainties, and Intergenerational Equity-The German Constitutional Court’s Climate Decision. German Law Journal, 22(8), 1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.81

Butt, S. (2022). What constitutes compliance? Legislative responses to Constitutional Court decisions in Indonesia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(1), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014

Clark, T. S. (2019). The supreme court: An analytic history of constitutional decision making. The Supreme Court: An Analytic History of Constitutional Decision Making, 1–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525367

Fatih, S. Al. (2023). Does the Constitutional Court on Local Election Responsive Decisions? Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 3(3), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i3.74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i3.74

Fauzan, I. (2024). The configuration of ethnic and religious relations towards the 2024 general election: A case study in Medan, Indonesia. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.31893/MULTISCIENCE.2024006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024006

Firdaus, A. A. (2024). Indonesian presidential election sentiment: Dataset of response public before 2024. Data in Brief, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109993

Galbraith, A. (2023a). JAMA Network Call for Papers on Health and the 2024 US Election. JAMA, 330(10), 923–924. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.14719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.14719

Galbraith, A. (2023b). JAMA Network Call for Papers on Health and the 2024 US Election. JAMA Health Forum, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3014

Gómez-Betancur, L. (2022). Ecosystem Services as a Promising Paradigm to Protect Environmental Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Latin America: the Constitutional Court Landmark Decision to Protect Arroyo Bruno in Colombia. Environmental Management, 69(4), 768–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01483-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01483-w

Gumbira, S. W. (2019). Quo vadis of reputation delict after constitutional court decision number 76/PUU-XV/2017. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(20), 519–525.

Hachem, D. W. (2021). The override of Brazilian Supreme Court’s decisions by the National Congress through constitutional amendments: Forced dialogue or overlapping monologues? Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais, 8(1), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.5380/RINC.V8I1.82738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v8i1.82738

Jaelani, A. K. (2019). Executability of the constitutional court decision regarding grace period in the formulation of legislation. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(15), 816–823.

Jaelani, A. K. (2021). The Crime Of Damage After the Constitutional Court’s Decision Number 76/PUU-XV/2017. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i1.5

Kristiyanti, D. A. (2019). Prediction of Indonesia presidential election results for the 2019-2024 period using twitter sentiment analysis. Proceedings of 2019 5th International Conference on New Media Studies, CONMEDIA 2019, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONMEDIA46929.2019.8981823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CONMEDIA46929.2019.8981823

Mayer, F. C. (2020a). The Ultra Vires Ruling: Deconstructing the German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP decision of 5 May 2020. European Constitutional Law Review, 16(4), 733–769. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000371

Mayer, F. C. (2020b). To boldly go where no court has gone before. The German federal constitutional court’s ultra vires decision of May 5, 2020. German Law Journal, 21(5), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.58

Nugraha, X. (2019). Reconstruction of Minimum Age for Marriage as a Form of Legal Protection for Women (Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XV/2017). Lex Scientia Law Review, 3(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v3i1.30727

Petersen, N. (2020). Karlsruhe’s Lochner moment? A rational choice perspective on the German federal constitutional court’s relationship to the CJEU after the PSPP decision. German Law Journal, 21(5), 995–1005. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.54

Prayatno, C., & Susilowati, T. (2023). Pemilihan Umum Serentak Tahun 2024 Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 1(4), 168–180.

Raposo, V. L. (2020). Rise and fall of surrogacy arrangements in Portugal (in the aftermath of decision n. 465/2019 of the Portuguese Constitutional Court). BioLaw Journal, 2020(1), 339–354.

Reinhardt, K. (2021). Suggestions of the German Medical Association on medical dealing with suicidal tendencies and death wishes in accordance with the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court on §217 of the Criminal Code. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 118(29).

Sadzali, A. (2022). Peranan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi Substantif pada Pemilu 2024 melalui Penegakan Hukum Progresif. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(2), 193–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v2i2.14948

Sert, M. F. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Decisions of the Turkish Constitutional Court. Social Science Computer Review, 40(6), 1416–1435. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211010398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211010398

Steinert, T. (2022). Effects of the Decision of the German Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint in 2018: Coercive measures in the psychiatric hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg in 2019 compared to the years 2015–2017. Nervenarzt, 93(7), 706–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01267-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01267-5

Subandri, R. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Persyaratan Batas Usia Pencalonan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden. Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(1), 135–153.

Sugitanata, A. (2023). Dinamika Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Batas Usia Calon Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden. Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 4(2), 127–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24239/qaumiyyah.v4i2.79

Yamey, G. (2024). Pandemic lessons for the 2024 US presidential election. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q150