Intercultural Communication Harmony of Bugis Migrants in Building Social Networks within Palm Oil Plantation Areas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/jbkd.v3i1.4931Keywords:
intercultural communication, social networks, Bugis migrants, palm oil plantation communities, social cohesionAbstract
This study examines the forms of intercultural communication harmony practiced by Bugis migrants in building social networks within the oil palm plantation areas of Baras District, Pasangkayu Regency. The research is significant because Bugis migrants, known for their long-standing migratory tradition (sompe’) and cultural values of siri’ na pacce, contribute to multicultural integration in plantation-based communities. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions, and analyzed with the Miles and Huberman model comprising data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that intercultural harmony is expressed through openness in social interactions, solidarity in community life, tolerance among religious groups, interethnic marriages, inclusive economic cooperation in plantation work, and the preservation of cultural identity alongside adaptation. These practices strengthen social networks across ethnic boundaries and minimize potential conflicts in a multicultural environment. The study underscores the importance of intercultural communication as a foundation for social cohesion in plural societies. It also provides practical insights for policymakers and community leaders in managing diversity within plantation contexts. The originality of this research lies in its focus on the intercultural communication harmony of Bugis migrants in plantation-based communities, a perspective that has received limited scholarly attention.
References
Acciaioli, G. (2017). Bugis migration and agrarian change in Southeast Asia: Patterns and impacts. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(2), 234–256. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463417000236](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463417000236)
Afrizal. (2016). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Sebuah upaya mendukung penggunaan penelitian kualitatif dalam berbagai ilmu disiplin (1st ed.). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Amalia, D. R. (2021). Akulturasi budaya Bugis dengan Islam dalam tradisi Barzanji di Sulawesi Selatan. Tebar Science: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Budaya, 5(3), 7–8. [https://doi.org/10.36653/akulturasi](https://doi.org/10.36653/akulturasi)
Andriani, H. B., Agustiati, Halim, H., Iskandar, A. M., Amir, A., & Burchanuddin, A. (2019). Constructing social harmony in plural society. In N. Susan (Ed.), Democracy and social transformation: Global–local tensions, contestations and collaborations (pp. 44–48). Asosiasi Program Studi Sosiologi Indonesia.
Anggreni, T. F. (2020). Pemberdayaan petani kelapa sawit dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat oleh Dinas Perkebunan dan Peternakan di Kecamatan Tikke Raya, Kabupaten Pasangkayu, Sulawesi Barat [Undergraduate thesis, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri].
Basri, H. (2020). Siri’ na pacce dalam dinamika migrasi Bugis: Studi kasus diaspora Bugis di Sulawesi Barat. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 42(1), 102–118. [https://doi.org/10.7454/jai.v42i1.276](https://doi.org/10.7454/jai.v42i1.276)
Bennett, J. M. (Ed.). (2015). The SAGE encyclopedia of intercultural competence. SAGE.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Gudykunst, W. B. (Ed.). (2005). Theorizing about intercultural communication. SAGE.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (4th ed.). McGraw–Hill.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor.
Hannerz, U. (1990). Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2), 237–251.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross cultural adaptation. SAGE.
Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2014). Theories of human communication (11th ed.). Waveland Press.
Liliweri, A. (2014). Komunikasi antarbudaya. Prenadamedia Group.
Mattulada. (1995). Latoa: Satu lukisan analitis tentang antropologi politik orang Bugis. Hasanuddin University Press.
Pelras, C. (1996). The Bugis. Blackwell.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2010). Communication between cultures (7th ed.). Wadsworth.
Suryawan, N. (2017). Kearifan lokal sebagai modal sosial dalam integrasi antara etnik Bali dan etnik Bugis di Desa Petang, Badung, Bali. Jurnal Kajian Bali, 7(1), 17–32.
Suliyati, T. (2016). Etnis Bugis di Kepulauan Karimunjawa: Harmoni dalam pelestarian budaya dan tradisi. Sabda, 11, 67–76.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Ting Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating across cultures. The Guilford Press.
Turistiati, A. T. (2019). Kompetensi komunikasi antarbudaya. Mitra Wacana Media.
Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 447–462.
Ward, C., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Nazir, M. (2013). Metode penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sitti Murni Kaddi, M. Junaidi, Muh. Zainuddin Badollahi, Hilda Anjarsari, Roman Rezki Utama, Wahyu Aprijal Siruah, Jimmy Wong Batewa, Najwa Zahiyah Amanda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



