Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Obyek Jaminan Fidusia yang Digadaikan Tanpa Persetujuan Penerima Fidusia (Studi Kasus di PT. Sinarmas Multifinance Cabang Jember)

M. Dani Cipta Nurrovik; Yunita Reykasari

doi:10.47134/ijlj.v1i2.2039

Authors

M. Dani Cipta Nurrovik Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
Yunita Reykasari Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i2.2039

Keywords:

Juridical Review, Fiduciary, Pawned

Abstract

This research examines the juridical review of fiduciary collateral objects pledged without the consent of the fiduciary recipient. The aim of this research is to analyze the juridical review of fiduciary collateral objects pledged without the consent of the fiduciary recipient. The research method used is the statutory approach method (statue approach) and the case approach method. The type of research is normative juridical, meaning that the problems raised, discussed and described in this research are prioritized by applying positive rules or norms. The research results reveal that in practice we encounter many cases with obstacles in the field. Firstly, this is because many fiduciary recipients still do not register fiduciary collateral objects. Second, fiduciary parties can still be found who violate the agreed provisions. Even though the object of the fiduciary guarantee has been registered, there are still fiduciary providers who pledge the object of the fiduciary guarantee. The form of formal legal protection that can be done is by registering the object of fiduciary collateral with the fiduciary registration office. The second step is to provide a clause to provide sanctions against the party giving the fiduciary.

References

Asyhadie, Z. (2018). Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia: Kajian Berdasarkan Hukum Nasional Dan Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Badriyah, S. M. (2021). Implementation of the constitutional court decision regarding the execution of fiduciary guarantees and inclusion of default clauses in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.05

Busro, A. (2018). Quo Vadis copyright as fiduciary guarantee in Indonesian legal arrangement. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 21(2).

Delfiyanti. (2021). Juridical review of disaster management policy in ASEAN and the correlation with the domestic management system of disaster in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 331. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202133102015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202133102015

Girardin, M. (2023). Taxation: Juridical literature review for the use of ancient history. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne, 49(1), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.3917/dha.491.0109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dha.491.0109

Hasan, D. (1996). Lembaga Jaminan Kebendaan Bagi Tanah dan Benda Lain yang Melekat pada Tanah dalam Konsepsi Penerapan Azas Pemisahan Horizontal. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Husada, V. S. (2023). Juridical Review on the Mandatory Biodiesel Program for Maintaining National Energy Security in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1187(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012036

Indra, M. (2019). Juridical Review of Shifting Region Area Pekanbaru City With Kampar Regency Of Riau Province. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i1.608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i1.608

Iudici, A. (2023). Factors influencing the assessment of witnesses in juridical contexts: a literature review. Legal, civil and psychological implications. Journal of Forensic Practice, 25(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-02-2022-0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-02-2022-0009

Kamello, T. (2015). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia. PT. Alumni.

Kosasih, J. I. (2022). Parate Execution After the Decision of The Costitutional Court (Mk) No. 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 And No: 02/Puu-Xix/2021 Concerning the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantee On Leasing Financing Institutions. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 10(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i1.971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i1.971

Manurung, R. (2020). Criminal action of good name pollution through the internet: A juridical review. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 4545–4548.

Manurung, R. S. (2022). Juridical Review on The Crime of Fraud in The Implementation of The Pyramid Scheme System of Business Actors. Quality - Access to Success, 23(188), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/23.188.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/23.188.20

Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Pranada.

Meiryani. (2022). Juridical review of law enforcement on money launderers: case study from Indonesia. Journal of Money Laundering Control. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-05-2022-0062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-05-2022-0062

Mohiuddin, A. (2020). When can Muslims withdraw or withhold life support? A narrative review of Islamic juridical rulings. Global Bioethics, 31(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2020.1736243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2020.1736243

Njatrijani, R. (2020). Business development of copyright and fiduciary guarantee in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(1), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/439

Nugroho, A. (2018). A juridical review of partnership agreements that have the elements of work agreements in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012169

Patrik, P., & Kashadi. (2009). Hukum Jaminan. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Prasetia, F. (2020). The data warehouse for guarantee of objects in the fiduciary. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 725(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/725/1/012104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/725/1/012104

Salim, H. S. (2004). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Santosa, C. H. (2019). Juridical review of abortion conducted by rape victims from positive law and human rights. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(20), 485–489.

Santosa, L. (2012). Hukum Perjanjian Kontrak. Cakrawala.

Setyawan, D. N. (2016). Upaya Perlindungan Kepada Pihak Bank Akibat Adanya Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Dialihkan Oleh Pihak Nasabah Tanpa Adanya Persetujuan Terlebih Dahulu Dari Pihak Bank Lain. Journal Diversi.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soepadmo, N. R. (2023). The Juridical Review of Foreign Workers Deportation During the Covid-19 Pandemic In Indonesia Reviewed From A Human Rights Perspective. Revista Juridica, 1(73), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v1i73.6097

Sriono. (2021). Dissenters vs debtors bank promise: A review of normative juridical. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24, 1–11.

Supriyadi. (2020). Reconstruction of the guarantee’s objects in the fiduciary agreement in Indonesia. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25, 260–271. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3774640

Thalib, E. F. (2019). Juridical Review on Marketplace Based on Indonesian Law and Legislation. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i2.622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i2.622

Villarreal, J. F. (2023). What Do We Understand by Islamic “Fundamentalism”? A Review Based on Our Hermeneutical Limits and The Sense of History In Terms of The Juridical-Political Legacy Of Such A Creed. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v11i1.270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v11i1.270