Analysis of Quantity Take Off Deviation Using BIM Method (Case Study of Construction of a Satpol PP Building)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/scbmej.v1i3.2828Keywords:
Autodesk Revit, Building Information Modelling, Quantity Take OffAbstract
Quantity Take Off (QTO) is in important process in the construction industry that calculates and estimates the amount of material needed to complete a construction project. This process includes detail analysis of design plans and technical specification to identify and calculate quantities. QTO results are used to create cost budgets, create project plans, and plan material procurement. This research explains the Building Information Modeling (BIM) application which uses Autodesk Revit software to calculate Quantity Take Off volume. The aim is to find out the difference between volume calculations using conventional methods and volume calculations using the BIM method and Quantity Take Off volumes in architectural work and structural work. A comparative analysis of conventional methods and the use of Autodesk Revit provide an overview of the efficiency and effectiveness of implementing BIM software in the Bantul Satpol PP Building Construction Project with a focus on structural an architectural work investigation studies. This research uses a case study methodology which includes a quantity survey using Building Information Modeling (BIM) techniques using Autodesk Revit and Microsoft Excel software. This research method includes preparatory steps, data collection techniques, 3D modeling, and data analysis based on volume the use of BIM software and conventional methods. Based on the survey results, the difference in volume calculations for architectural work is 9,68% and for structural work is 9,00%, this shows that volume calculations using the BIM method are smaller than using conventional methods.
References
Anindya, A. A., & Gondokusumo, O. (2020). Kajian Penggunaan Cubicost Untuk Pekerjaan Quantity Take Off Pada Proses Tender. Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran Dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 4(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v4i1.6718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v4i1.6718
Apriadi, A. (2024). The application of building information modelling (BIM) for cost and time analysis: Bintang Bano Dam, West Sumbawa, Indonesia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2927(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0192688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0192688
CRC Construction Innovation. (2007). Adopting BIM for facilities management Solutions for managing the Sydney Opera House.
Dwi Novita, R., & Pangestuti, E. K. (2021). Analisa Quantity Take Off Dan Rencana Anggaran Biaya Dengan Metode Building Information Modeling (Bim) Menggunakan Software Autodeks Revit 2019 (Studi Kasus: Gedung Lp3 Universitas Negeri Semarang) Quantity Take Off Analysis And Cost Budget Plan Using Building Information Modeling (Bim) Method Using Autodeks Revit 2019 Software (Case Study: Lp3 Building Of Universitas Negeri Semarang). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/dts.v14i1.15276
Ergen, F. (2024). Development of ontological algorithms for exact QTO of reinforced concrete construction items. Structures, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105907
Forth, K. (2023). Calculation of embodied GHG emissions in early building design stages using BIM and NLP-based semantic model healing. Energy and Buildings, 284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112837
Hage, S. (2023). Efficiency in the Preparation of Life Cycle Assessment. Environmental Science and Engineering, 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43478-5_15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43478-5_15
Huang, M. Q. (2023). A framework for integrating embodied carbon assessment and construction feasibility in prefabricated stations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104920
Ike Marbun Nur Rohmah. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Perhitungan Volume Struktur Antara Building Information Modelling Dengan Metode Konvensional Pada Proyek Design & Build Penataan Kawasan Pura Besakih.
Karya, J., & Sipil, T. (2016). Perbandingan Efisiensi Waktu, Biaya, Dan Sumber Daya Manusia Antara Metode Building Information Modelling (Bim) Dan Konvensional (Studi Kasus: Perencanaan Gedung 20 Lantai) (Vol. 5, Issue 2). Halaman. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkts
Laorent, D., Nugraha, P., & Budiman, J. (2019). Analisa Quantity Take-Off Dengan Menggunakan Autodesk Revit. Dimensi Utama Teknik Sipil, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9744/duts.6.1.1-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/duts.6.1.1-8
Luqman Alghifarry. (2017). S1-2017-330418-abstract.
Olsen, D., & Taylor, J. M. (2017). Quantity Take-Off Using Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Its Limiting Factors. Procedia Engineering, 196, 1098–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.067
Ren, S. (2024). An automatic design-feedback process for structural prefabricated components quantity take-off calculation using BIM. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2272623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2272623
Risky Apriansyah. (2021). Lembar Pengesahan Implementasi Konsep Building Information Modelling (Bim) Dalam Estimasi Quantity Take Off Material Pekerjaan Struktural Implementation The Concept Of Building Information Modelling (BIM) In The Estimation Of Quantity Take Off Materials Of Structural Work.
Sampaio, A. Z. (2023a). BIM Manager Role in the Integration and Coordination of Construction Projects. Buildings, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082101
Sampaio, A. Z. (2023b). The use of BIM-based tools to improve collaborative building projects. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 2027–2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.504
Saputra, C. G. P. H. (2024). Application of 5D building information modeling using Cubicost in estimating construction structure work costs (Case study: Emergency Room and Hemodialysis Building at Waras Wiris Local General Hospital of Boyolali, Indonesia). Engineering and Applied Science Research, 51(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.14456/easr.2024.27
Saputra, H. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Quantity Take-Off Material Between Conventional Method & BIM Nemetschek Allplan Method on Bridge. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 12(4), 2622–2633. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2024.120410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2024.120410
Sholichan, A. (2024). Minimize the risk of time delay & cost overrun based on M-PERT & BIM 5D on structural work in stadium construction. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2710(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0144140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0144140
Sierra, C. (2023). Building Information Modelling for Constructability and Asset Management of Large Rail Infrastructure. 2023 IEEE Engineering Informatics, EI 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF58110.2023.10520519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF58110.2023.10520519
Tanko, B. L. (2024). BIM in the Malaysian construction industry: a scientometric review and case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(3), 1165–1186. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2021-0324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2021-0324
Valinejadshoubi, M. (2024). Automated system for high-accuracy quantity takeoff using BIM. Automation in Construction, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105155
Wardito, E. (2024). Increasing the value of jetty projects based on building information modelling 5D (BIM 5D). AIP Conference Proceedings, 2710(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0144139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0144139
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Reza Nur Fadlilah, Fajar Sri Handayani, Muji Rifai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
