Interpretasi Kritik Arsitektur Pada Bangunan Bergaya Kolonial Belanda “Notariskantoor Bojonegoro” Dengan Metode Kritik Normatif, Interpretatif, dan Deskriptif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/scbmej.v2i1.3535Keywords:
Kritik, Kolonial, EstetikaAbstract
Buildings that are unique and different from most of the buildings around them can be striking and attract attention, besides this difference in design can also become branding and a landmark for the area. This can also be seen in the unique Notaris Kantoor building located in Bojonegoro Regency, so the aim of making this building an object of criticism is to introduce the design of this building to the general public to use as design inspiration and break the negative stigma about the building in question. The criticism methods used are normative criticism, interpretive criticism and descriptive criticism. Normatively, this building is a new building that was deliberately designed with a Dutch colonial concept, the choice of shape, materials and colors gives a calm impression so that it is easy to remember as an iconic place in the Bojonegoro area. Interpretatively, this building might give rise to a different perspective from the public towards the building owner who considers the owner of this building to have a high RAS and social strata. However, despite this, this building still fits in the area and has a distinctive characteristic in the minds of the people. Descriptively, this building has 2 viewpoints from which you can enjoy its beauty because it is located in the corner area of a T-junction so the view is not disturbed by other buildings and choosing the right materials makes this building have more aesthetic value. Based on the results of this criticism, it can be concluded that the Notaris Kantoor building has a unique and striking Dutch colonial design style. The choice of location, color, ornaments and materials is very precise, giving the impression that it is not excessive so that the negative stigma about building designs that are considered haunted and related to the owner's RAS can be broken.
References
Antariksa, A. (2017). Karakter Visual Rumah Dinas Kolonial Belanda Pabrik Gula Japtiroto Lumajang (Doctoral dissertation, Brawijaya University).
Azizah, R. (2015). Kritik ‘Depiktif’ arsitektur Pada Petronas Twin Towers Kuala Lumpur. Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur, 13(2), 83-89.
Bahrun, R. S., & Ramadhani, S. Q. (2024). Analisis Teori dan Kritik Terhadap Arsitektur Masjid 99 Kubah Makassar. Journal of Green Complex Engineering, 1(2), 107-115.
Belina, B., Khadafi, M., & Rahayu, E. W. (2023). Pendekatan Frugal Architecture Dalam Konsep Perancangan Taman Kanak-Kanak. Jurnal Sangkareang Mataram, 10(1), 1-7.
Dafrina, A., Hassan, S. M., & Zahara, A. (2021). Identifikasi Langgam Gaya Arsitektur Transisi/Peralihan Serta Karakter Visual Fasad Pada Arsitektur Peninggalan Kolonial Di Kecamatan Banda Sakti Kota Lhokseumawe. Arsitekno, 8(2), 56-67.
Dewi, F. C., Saraswati, U., & Muntholib, A. (2019). Perkembangan Arsitektur pada Masa Kolonial di Surakarta Tahun 1900-1942: Tinjauan Politik, Sosial dan Pendidikan. Journal of Indonesian History, 8(2), 96-104.
Djono, D., Utomo, T. P., & Subiyantoro, S. (2012). Nilai Kearifan Lokal Rumah.
Indriani, C., & Arsanti, M. (2024). Pengaruh Bahasa Asing Terhadap Struktur Dan Kosakata Bahasa Indonesia: Analisis Sinkronis Dan Diakronis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(3), 1900-1907.
Kawulusan, M., & Warouw, F. (2017). Perancangan Public Landmark Pada Ruang Terbuka Publik. Media Matrasain, 14(3), 39-51.
Kolonial di Surakarta Tahun 1900-1942: Tinjauan Politik, Sosial dan Pendidikan. Journal of Indonesian History, 8(2), 96-104.
Muhamad, Y. A., Ilhamdaniah, I., & Widaningsih, L. (2024). Kritik Arsitektur terhadap Aspek Keselamatan Sarana Penyelamatan Jiwa Bangunan Gedung Studi Kasus: Gedung Pusat Antar Universitas (PAU) ITB Bandung. Jurnal Talenta Sipil, 7(2), 520-539.
Murtomo, B. A. (2008). Arsitektur Kolonial Kota Lama Semarang. Jurnal Ilmiah Perancangan Kota dan Permukiman, 7(2), 69-79.
Nurhajarini, D. R., & Purwaningsih, E. (2015). Akulturasi lintas zaman di Lasem: Perspektif sejarah dan budaya (kurun niaga-sekarang). Fibiona.
Pratama, N., Rahmadianto, S. A., & Nugroho, D. P. (2022). Perancangan Buku Fotografi Arsitektur Kolonial Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Tarik Wisata Heritage Di Kota Malang. Sainsbertek Jurnal Ilmiah Sains & Teknologi, 3(1), 152-168.
Prayudi, G. M., & Salindri, D. (2015). Pendidikan pada masa pemerintahan kolonial Belanda di Surabaya tahun 1901-1942 (Education on Dutch Government in Surabaya at 1901-1942). Publika Budaya, 3(1), 20-34.
Purnomo, H., Waani, J. O., & Wuisang, C. E. (2017). Gaya & Karakter Visual Arsitektur Kolonial Belanda Di Kawasan Benteng Oranje Ternate. Media Matrasain, 14(1), 23-33.
Putri, F. A., Bramasta, D., & Hawanti, S. (2020). Studi literatur tentang peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam pembelajaran menggunakan model pembelajaran the power of two di SD. Jurnal Educatio Fkip Unma, 6(2), 605-610.
Rahardjo, M. (2011). Metode pengumpulan data penelitian kualitatif.
Saidi, A. W. (2020). Eksplorasi fotografi arsitektur sebagai karya seni. Jurnal Teknik Gradien, 12(1), 93-107.
Sukawi, S., & Iswanto, D. (2011). Adaptasi Tampilan Bangunan Indis Akibat Perubahan Fungsi Bangunan. Jurnal Jurusan Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Undip, 11(2).
Martana, S. P., Yapsie, J. C., & Saty, Y. (2021). Pengaruh Gaya Amsterdam School pada fasade Gedung Villa Merah. Waca Cipta Ruang, 7(2), 80-85.
```
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ine Distiana Rohmadhoni, Dhiah Agustina Qahar, Aktur Ali Shodikin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.