Transformasi Kompetensi Interpersonal CPNS melalui Experiential Learning: Studi Program Setneg ke Sekolah (SkS)

Adi Ageng Rismoko; Raisa Ayu Rininta; Lita Efrianna Br Ginting

doi:10.47134/par.v3i3.5823

Authors

Adi Ageng Rismoko Universitas Indonesia
Raisa Ayu Rininta Universitas Indonesia
Lita Efrianna Br Ginting Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/par.v3i3.5823

Keywords:

Experiential Learning, Off-the-Job Training, Onboarding, CPNS, Kompetensi Interpersonal, BerAKHLAK, Meaning of Work, Sosialisasi Organisasi

Abstract

Program onboarding aparatur sipil negara pada umumnya masih didominasi oleh pendekatan klasikal yang berorientasi pada aspek kognitif di dalam kelas, sehingga menghadapi tantangan dalam menjembatani antara pemahaman nilai teoretis dan manifestasi perilaku nyata di lapangan. Program Setneg ke Sekolah (SkS) tahun 2025 menawarkan paradigma baru melalui pendekatan off-the-job training berbasis pengabdian masyarakat, dengan menempatkan 386 CPNS Kementerian Sekretariat Negara di 278 sekolah se-Jabodetabek selama tiga minggu. Penelitian evaluatif ini bertujuan secara khusus untuk menganalisis efektivitas Program SkS sebagai instrumen experiential learning, mengidentifikasi mekanisme internalisasi nilai BerAKHLAK, serta memosisikan program ini dalam lanskap global. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan studi evaluatif dengan desain mixed-method sekuensial-eksplanatori. Integrasi data dilakukan melalui survei sekolah mitra, pelaporan digital Setneg Talent Scorecard (STS), jurnal reflektif mingguan peserta, serta wawancara mendalam terhadap lima CPNS dan dua mentor program. Mengacu pada kerangka teori Kolb (1984), Chalofsky (2014), serta Werner dan DeSimone (2012), hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa interaksi sosial di luar ekosistem birokrasi berkontribusi signifikan terhadap pengembangan kompetensi interpersonal, terutama pada aspek komunikasi lintas konteks, kepemimpinan situasional, dan empati sosial. Sebanyak 89,5% sekolah mitra menilai sikap peserta berada pada kategori sangat baik. Keterlibatan emosional secara aktif dalam tugas nyata terbukti mempercepat internalisasi nilai BerAKHLAK melalui mekanisme meaning of work yang didorong oleh tingginya task significance. Selain itu, kualitas mentoring terbukti memoderasi kedalaman transformasi reflektif yang dicapai peserta. Secara komparatif, SkS menunjukkan karakteristik berbeda dengan keunggulan utama pada dimensi keterlibatan komunitas dibandingkan dengan praktik sektor publik di Singapura, Amerika Serikat, dan Inggris. Kesimpulannya, Program SkS efektif memicu transformasi kompetensi interpersonal dan pergeseran identitas profesional dari orientasi administratif konvensional menuju pelayanan publik yang lebih kontekstual.

References

Abidin, D. (2021). Efektifitas Pelatihan Dasar Calon Pegawai Negeri Sipil Dalam Menumbuhkan Pegawai Negeri Sipil Profesional Yang Berkarakter. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan. https://doi.org/10.35446/diklatreview.v5i2.545

Ashforth, B. E., Sluss, D. M., & Saks, A. M. (2007). Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(3), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.02.001

Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J. Appl. Psychol., 92(3), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707

Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2011). Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. In APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 51–64). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-002

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol., 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cable, D. M., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2013). Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers’ authentic self-expression. Adm. Sci. Q., 58(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213477098

Chalofsky, N. E., Rocco, T. S., & Morris, M. L. (2014). Handbook of Human Resource Development. Wiley.

Clutterbuck, D. (2004). Everyone Needs a Mentor-Fostering Talent in Your Organisation (4th Ed.). CIPD Enterprises.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq., 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Acad. Manage. Rev., 6(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.2307/257888

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform., 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7

Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18121

Kementerian Sekretariat Negara RI. (2025a). Buku saku Setneg ke Sekolah (SkS).

Kementerian Sekretariat Negara RI. (2025b). LAPORAN PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM SETNEG KE SEKOLAH ( SkS ).

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (Vol. 19, Issue 2). San Franciso.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning : experience as the source of learning and development.

Lankau, M. J., & Scandura, T. A. (2002). An investigation of personal learning in mentoring relationships: Content, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Manage. J., 45(4), 779–790. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069311

Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Int. J. Intercult. Relat., 9(4), 438–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

McCall, M., Lombardo, M., & Morrison, A. (1988). The Lessons of Experience: How Successful Executives Develop on the Job.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. 42(3), 195–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369204200309

Morrison, E. W. (2002). Newcomers’ relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Acad. Manage. J., 45(6), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069430

Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership (3 rd ed.). Jossey Bass.

Steger, M. F., Littman-Ovadia, H., Miller, M., Menger, L., & Rothmann, S. (2012). Engaging in work even when it is meaningless. J. Career Assess., 21(2), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712471517

Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward of Theory of Organizational Socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior.

Werner, J. M., & DeSimone, R. L. (2012). human resource development (6th international edition),. Manag. Int. Rev., 55(3), 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-013-0197-9

Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Adm., 80(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00296

Wilson, J. P. (2004). Human Resource Development: Learning & Training for Individuals & Organizations (2nd ed.). Kogan Page Limited.

Yin, R. K. (2014). case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Can. J. Program Eval., 30(1), 108–110. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108