Criminal Offenses Committed by Civilians Together With Members Of The Military

Handika Syahputra Tamba; July Esther; Jusnizar Sinaga

doi:10.47134/ijlj.v2i3.3576

Authors

Handika Syahputra Tamba Fakultas Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen
July Esther Fakultas Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen
Jusnizar Sinaga Fakultas Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i3.3576

Keywords:

Connectivity, Criminal, Justice

Abstract

The Military Court can only deal with such cases if there is a decision by the Minister of Defense and Security, approved by the Minister of Justice, to transfer it to a military court. This decision is usually based on consideration of the degree of harm caused to military interests. Based on the types and sources of data used in this research, the author applies normative qualitative research methods. Normative qualitative research is an approach carried out through literature studies by utilizing various references, such as laws, books, journals, theses, and laws and regulations relevant to the formulation of research problems Conflicting sentences reflect the complexity of the criminal justice system involving various legal institutions, such as military police, civilian police, military prosecutors. The handling of this case requires good coordination between institutions to ensure a transparent legal process, in accordance with applicable regulations. This mechanism aims to accommodate equal legal treatment of perpetrators, both members of the military and civilians, while maintaining military discipline, the rule of law. Conflicting crimes reflect the complexity of the criminal justice system in Indonesia, because they involve two different legal jurisdictions. The mechanisms set out in the Military Justice Law aim to ensure justice for perpetrators and victims, while still considering the efficiency and effectiveness of the legal process. The handling of koneksitas cases requires cross-institutional cooperation to ensure a fair and transparent legal process.

References

Bagir, M. (2008). Ilmuan & Penegak Hukum: Kenangan Sebuah Pengabdian, Jakarta:

Behavior, O. (2005). Buku Referensi.

Djama'an Satori ; Aan Komariah. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.

Edy, Slamet Sarwo. (2024). ANALISIS YURISDIKSI KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN DALAM MENGADILI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANGGOTA MILITER BERSAMA-SAMA DENGAN ORANG SIPIL. Fortiori Law Journal 4.01.

Hamzah, Andi. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.

Khoiroh, A., & Firmansyah, H. (2023). Sistem Pembuktian yang Digunakan Oditur Militer dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana yang Dilakukan Anggota Militer. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5668-5674.d

Mahkamah Agung RI.

Mahmudi, M. (2023). TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM ANGGOTA MILITER DALAM KASUS KORUPSI MELALUI PERADILAN KONEKSITAS ANTARA KPK DAN TNI. HUNILA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan, 2(1), 113-124.

Moh. Nazir. (2014). Metode Penelitian. Risman Sikumbang.

Rasyid Ariman, Fahmi Raghib. (2015). Hukum Pidana.

Ridlo, A., Pratiwi, S., & Mardani, M. (2024). Analisis Penyelesaian Perkara Koneksitas Dalam Perspektif Pidana Umum Dan Pidana Militer. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 8(1), 45-57.

Rumate, Priska VO. (2023). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Militer. Lex Administratum 11.1.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D.

Swandana, M. D. M. (2024). KEWENANGAN PERADILAN MILITER TERHADAP PENEGAKAN HUKUM PADA PERKARA KONEKSITAS YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA (TNI). JURNAL HUKUM MILITER, 17(2), 1-21.

Syamsuddin, Arwin. (2017). Kajian tentang anggota Militer yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana dalam Perkara Koneksitas Menurut Kuhap, Lex Crimen.

Yahya Harahap, M. (2007). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan.