Reimagining Democracy: An Exploration of Anies Baswedan's "Desak Anies" Program

Kurniawan Arif Maspul

doi:10.47134/jsd.v1i3.2243

Authors

Kurniawan Arif Maspul University of the People https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-3688

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jsd.v1i3.2243

Keywords:

Democracy, Citizen empowerment, Grassroots mobilization, Governance transparency, Youth empowerment, Community cohesion, Environmental sustainability

Abstract

Global democracy is at a crossroads, amidst geopolitical turmoil and socioeconomic upheaval. Despite widespread support for democratic principles such as popular sovereignty and civic involvement, their practical implementation is frequently hampered by entrenched power dynamics and vested interests. Anies Baswedan's pioneering "Desak Anies" program in Indonesia takes a novel approach to democratic government, questioning traditional top-down methods and calling for active citizen participation in decision-making processes. This study, based on theoretical frameworks proposed by authors such as Dahl and Rousseau, investigates the Desak Anies initiative's complex impact. The study's qualitative research approaches, which include a literature review and content analysis observations, aim to provide thorough insights into Desak Anies' transformative potential in transforming democratic behaviors. The findings show that Desak Anies had a significant impact on youth empowerment, instilling a sense of agency and political efficacy in young Indonesians. Furthermore, the program has made a substantial contribution to improving community cohesiveness by giving a forum for varied views to be heard and respected. Desak Anies has ushered in a new era of governmental openness, with an emphasis on open data projects and citizen involvement, which promote accountability and trust in government institutions; establishes a new benchmark for democratic renewal and sustainability by leveraging grassroots mobilization and adopting inclusive policies, providing a replicable model for advancing democracy and fostering inclusive government on a global scale.

References

Aspinall, E. (2013). The triumph of capital? Class politics and Indonesian Democratisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(2), 226-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2012.757432

Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213512978

Baswedan, A. (2024). "Desak Anies #22 Surabaya" YouTube, uploaded by Anies Baswedan, 9 February 2024, https://www.youtube.com/live/7ZPZi8cVrmU?si=JUTX6Xc_lrRLQDPo

Bryman, A. (2011). Mission accomplished?: Research methods in the first five years of Leadership. Leadership, 7(1), 73-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715010386864

Chaniago, M. I. (2019). Examining Pancasila’s Position in the Public Reason Scheme: A Critical Analysis. Jurnal Politik, 4(2), 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v4i2.203

Cohen, J. (2005). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In Debates in contemporary political philosophy (pp. 352-370). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986820-28

Dahl, R. A. (2000). On Democracy Yale University Press. New Haven & London.

Dahl, R. A. (2008). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale university press.

Dalton, R. J. (2015). The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. CQ press.

Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. JHU press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801860140

Diamond, L. (2008). The spirit of democracy: The struggle to build free societies throughout the world. Macmillan.

Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Weber, E. U. (2013). Reducing carbon-based energy consumption through changes in household behavior. Daedalus, 142(1), 78-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00186

Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019925043X.001.0001

Fatlolon, C. (2016). Pancasila Democracy and the Play of the Good. Filocracia, 3(1), 70-92.

Fung, A. (2003). Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes, and realities. Annual review of sociology, 29(1), 515-539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100134

Hosen, N. (2005). Indonesian Law Reform in the Post-Soeharto Era. In Asian Futures, Asian Traditions (pp. 196-219). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004213784_016

Huntington, S. P. (1993). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century (Vol. 4). University of Oklahoma press.

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence (Vol. 333). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues1. Hague journal on the rule of law, 3(2), 220-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046

Kersten, C. (2009). Islam, Cultural Hybridity and Cosmopolitanism: New Muslim Intellectuals on Globalization. Journal of International & Global Studies, 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.62608/2158-0669.1004

Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. jhu Press.

Magstadt, T. M. (2020). Understanding politics: Ideas, institutions, and issues. Cengage Learning.

Mansbridge, J. (1993). Feminism and democratic community. Democratic Community: Nomos XXXV, 339-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814723630.003.0018

McLeod, R. H., & MacIntyre, A. (Eds.). (2007). Indonesia: democracy and the promise of good governance. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812304674

Mu'ti, A., & Burhani, A. N. (2019). The limits of religious freedom in Indonesia: with reference to the first pillar Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa of Pancasila. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 9(1), 111-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v9i1.111-134

Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2014). The social impact of income inequality: Poverty, deprivation, and social cohesion. Changing Inequalities in Rich Countries. Analytical and Comparative Perspectives, 146-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687435.003.0006

Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610073

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Rosser, A., & Wilson, I. (2012). Democratic decentralisation and pro-poor policy reform in Indonesia: the politics of health insurance for the poor in Jembrana and Tabanan. Asian Journal of Social Science, 40(5-6), 608-634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-12341268

Rousseau, J. J. (1987). [1762] The Social Contract. The Basic Political Writings.

Syalianda, S. I., & Kusumastuti, R. D. (2021, March). Implementation of smart city concept: A case of Jakarta smart city, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 716, No. 1, p. 012128). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012128

Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of public economics, 76(3), 399-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4

Warren, M. E. (2001). Democracy and association. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823925

Whitehead, L. (2002). Democratization: Theory and experience. Oxford University Press, USA.

Wijaya, S., Maspul, K. A., Awadi, E., & Acuña-Ramírez, C. (2021). Managing in the Global Economy.