Reformasi Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia: Meningkat, Independensi, dan Kualitas

(Judicial Power Reform in Indonesia: Improving Independence, Transparency, and Quality)

Authors

  • Christian Immanuel Situmorang Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Irwan Triadi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jcl.v1i2.2429

Keywords:

Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Reformasi, Stabilitas Negara

Abstract

Dalam menegakkan supremasi hukum serta menjamin perlindungan hak asasi manusia, setiap individu diperlakukan secara adil di hadapan hukum menjaga independensi dan integritas peradilan harus menjadi prioritas utama bagi negara, dalam melaksanakan tugas dapat dilaksanakan secara efektif dengan penerapan prinsip-prinsip independensi, integritas, dan objektivitas sebagai landasan dalam menjalankan peradilan untuk menciptakan keputusan dan kepastian yang mengikat semua pihak hukum di masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui Bagaimana peran kekuasaan kehakiman dalam menjaga stabilitas kekuasaan negara dan mengawasi penerapan hukum di berbagai sektor, serta upaya reformasi yang dapat dilakukan untuk memperkuat independensi, transparansi, dan kualitas kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia.  Dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dan studi kepustakaan, penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan yang komprehensif tentang peran kekuasaan kehakiman dalam menjaga stabilitas kekuasaan negara dan mengawasi penerapan hukum di berbagai sektor, serta menyediakan kerangka kerja untuk merumuskan rekomendasi kebijakan yang dapat meningkatkan independensi, transparansi, dan kualitas kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian ini hakim berperan krusial dalam menjaga stabilitas negara Indonesia melalui penegakan hukum. Penting bagi Indonesia sebagai negara hukum untuk memperkuat integritas, kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem peradilan, dan kemerdekaan hukum dengan peningkatan fasilitas, pelayanan, dan transparansi lembaga peradilan

References

Adonara, F. F. (2015). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(2), 217–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1222

Andreetta, S. (2020). The Symbolic Power of the State: Inheritance Disputes and Litigants’ Judicial Trajectories in Cotonou. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 43(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12341

Ani Purwati S. H., M. H. C. C. C. C. L. A. C. & C. L. I. C. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Teori dan Praktek. Jakad Media Publishing.

Armia, M. S. (2022). POST AMENDMENT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDONESIA: HAS JUDICIAL POWER DISTRIBUTED FAIRLY? Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(2), 525–556. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.56335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.56335

Bakiner, O. (2020). Endogenous sources of judicial power: Parapolitics and the supreme court of colombia. Comparative Politics, 52(4), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041520X15743890683814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5129/001041520X15743890683814

Bartels, B. L. (2020). Does Public Support for Judicial Power Depend on Who is in Political Power? Testing a Theory of Partisan Alignment in Africa. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000704

Bellamy, R. (2019). The republican core of the case for judicial review: A reply to Tom Hickey. Why political constitutionalism requires equality of power and weak review. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(1), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz012

Chemin, M. (2021). Can judiciaries constrain executive power? Evidence from judicial reforms. Journal of Public Economics, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104428

Engst, B. G. (2021). The Two Faces of Judicial Power: Dynamics of Judicial–Political Bargaining. The Two Faces of Judicial Power: Dynamics of Judicial–Political Bargaining, 1–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7_1

Hong, J. S. (2019). Signaling the turn: The supermajority requirement and judicial power on the constitutional court of Korea†. American Journal of Comparative Law, 67(1), 177–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz008

Ji, W. (2020). The Change of Judicial Power in China in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(3), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.37

Kekuasaan Eksekutif Pengertian, Tujuan, Aspek, Tugas, dan Contohnya – Berita dan Informasi. (n.d.). https://umsu.ac.id/berita/kekuasaan-

Kleandrov, M. I. (2021). On the directions of improving the mechanism of judicial power in ensuring the fairness of justice. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 2021(3), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520014034-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520014034-8

Krehbiel, J. N. (2022). Can International Courts Enhance Domestic Judicial Review? Separation of Powers and the European Court of Justice. Journal of Politics, 84(1), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1086/715250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/715250

Lambais, G. (2023). Judicial subversion: The effects of political power on court outcomes. Journal of Public Economics, 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104788

Landfried, C. (2019). Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations. Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations, 1–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348669.001

Mayer, F. C. (2019). Judicial power and european integration: The case of germany. Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations, 183–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348669.009

N. P. P. ... & Paminto, S. R. (2023). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BIDANG HUKUM: Suatu Pendekatan Teori Dan Praktik. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Neo, J. L. (2020). A contextual approach to unconstitutional constitutional amendments: Judicial power and the basic structure doctrine in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 15(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2020.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2020.8

Niaz, I. (2020). Judicial activism and the evolution of Pakistan’s culture of power. Round Table, 109(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2020.1717091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2020.1717091

Parmet, W. E. (2023). Judicial Review of Public Health Powers Since the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends and Implications. American Journal of Public Health, 113(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307181

pendidikan.Id, A. (2023). Pentingnya Peran Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan: Memahami Arti dan Dampaknya. https://artikelpendidikan.id/apa-arti-penting-hukum-

Potts, S. (2020). Law as Geopolitics: Judicial Territory, Transnational Economic Governance, and American Power. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(4), 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1670041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1670041

Prek, M. (2019). “Administrative discretion”, “power of appraisal”and “margin of appraisal” in judicial review proceedings before the general court. Common Market Law Review, 56(2), 339–380. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2019027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2019027

Serjono, S. (2005). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum Universitas Indonesia. Grafindo.

Shapiro, M. M. (2019). Judicial power and democracy. Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations, 21–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348669.002

Tahir R., A. I. G. P. W. A. P. M. L. R. M. M. D. B. D. (2017). Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 46(4), 336–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.46.4.2017.336-342

Thym, D. (2020). Friendly takeover, or: The power of the “first word”: The German constitutional court embraces the charter of fundamental rights as a standard of domestic judicial review. European Constitutional Law Review, 16(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000127

UMSU, F. H. (2023). Perlindungan dan Penegakan Hukum: Menjaga Keadilan dan Ketertiban. https://fahum.umsu.ac.id/perlindungan-

Widodo, J. P. (2012). Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Mafia Peradilan. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(1), 108–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.1.200

Downloads

Published

2024-05-08

How to Cite

Situmorang, C. I., & Triadi, I. (2024). Reformasi Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia: Meningkat, Independensi, dan Kualitas: (Judicial Power Reform in Indonesia: Improving Independence, Transparency, and Quality). Journal Customary Law, 1(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.47134/jcl.v1i2.2429

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): March

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Immanuel Situmorang, Irwan Triadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.