Konstruksi Identitas dan Kemewahan Digital di Instagram melalui Hermes Birkin sebagai False Commodity

Authors

  • Ganis Resmisari Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/dkv.v3i1.5454

Keywords:

False Commodity, Instagram, Kemewahan digital, Konstruksi Identitas, Representasi visual

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji konstruksi identitas dan kemewahan digital yang ditampilkan di Instagram melalui representasi Hermes Birkin sebagai false commodity. Di era digital, objek mode tidak lagi berfungsi sebagai produk material akan tetapi sebagai tanda simbolik yang memediasi pembentukan identitas, status sosial dan juga gaya hidup. Tujuan penelitian untuk menganalisis bagaimana representasi visual objek tas Hermes Birkin di Instagram beroperasi sebagai sistem yang mengkonstruksi identitas dan kemewahan digital melalui logika komodifikasi simbolik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis visual budaya terhadap konten Instagram yang menampilkan Hermes Birkin. Data dikumpulkan secara purposif dari unggahan publik figur Indonesia dengan mempertimbangkan tingkat engagement, konteks visual dan representasi gaya hidup mewah. Kerangka teoretis menggabungkan konsep false commodity dalam konsumsi simbolik, teori hiperrealitas  Jean Baudrillard, fetisisme komoditas Karl Marx, serta teori representasi visual dalam budaya digital. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tas Birkin direpresentasikan sebagai simbol kemewahan yang tidak bergantung pada kepemilikan objek secara langsung akan tetapi pada kemampuan citra visual membentuk persepsi status, eksklusivitas dan pengakuan sosial. Estetika visual, performativitas sosial dan self-presentation bekerja membentuk nilai kemewahan tersebut. Representasi tersebut membentuk Birkin sebagai false commodity, dimana nilai simbolik lebih dominan dibanding nilai fungsinya. Hermes Birkin berfungsi sebagai objek simbolik yang membentuk identitas sosial dan kemewahan digital melalui logika visualitas, performativitas, dan visibilitas di ruang media sosial. Temuan diharapkan  berkontribusi pada kajian budaya visual dan desain komunikasi visual dengan menunjukkan bagaimana citra digital mengorganisasi makna kemewahan, konsumsi simbolik, dan praktik representasi diri kontemporer di Indonesia. Temuan memperluas pemahaman tentang visualitas, konsumsi, dan budaya digital kontemporer

References

Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with Influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177

Agung Setyawan, Pawito, & Andrik Purwasito. (2024). How Significant is Instagram in Shaping Personal Branding? Literature Review. Formosa Journal of Social Sciences (FJSS), 3(3), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjss.v3i3.10622

Bonilla-Quijada, M., Del Olmo, J. L., Andreu, D., & Ripoll, J. (2023). Customer engagement on Instagram for luxury fashion brands: An empirical comparative analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2235169. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2235169

Boy, J. D., & Uitermark, J. (2020). Lifestyle Enclaves in the Instagram City? Social Media + Society, 6(3), 2056305120940698. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120940698

Creevey, D., Coughlan, J., & O’Connor, C. (2022). Social media and luxury: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(1), 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12271

Dion, D., & Borraz, S. (2017). Managing Status: How Luxury Brands Shape Class Subjectivities in the Service Encounter. Journal of Marketing, 81(5), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0291

Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2021). Gendered Visibility on Social Media: Navigating Instagram’s Authenticity Bind. In J. Pooley (Ed.), Open Reader Series (1st ed., Vol. 1). mediastudies.press. https://doi.org/10.32376/3f8575cb.3f03db0e

Eka Putra, F., & Afrilian, P. (2025). Visual Culture in Social Media: A Study on the Influence of Instagram on Aesthetics and Youth Culture Trends. Asian Journal of Media and Culture, 1(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.63919/ajmc.v1i1.18

Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332

Holmqvist, J., Wirtz, J., & Fritze, M. P. (2020). Luxury in the digital age: A multi-actor service encounter perspective. Journal of Business Research, 121, 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.038

Hu, Y., Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2014). What We Instagram: A First Analysis of Instagram Photo Content and User Types. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 595–598. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14578

Jaramillo-Dent, D. (2022). Instagram: Visual social media cultures: by Tama Leaver, Tim Highfield and Crystal Abidin, Medford, MA: Polity Press, 2020, 264 pp., $22.95 (paperback), ISBN: 978-1-5095-3438-8. Information, Communication & Society, 25(9), 1351–1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1950805

Jhally, S. (1995). The Codes of Advertising: Fetishism and the Political Economy of Meaning in the Consumer Society. Canadian Journal of Communication, 20(1), cjc.1995v20n1a849. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.1995v20n1a849

Kusumasondjaja, S. (2019). Exploring the role of visual aesthetics and presentation modality in luxury fashion brand communication on Instagram. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 24(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-02-2019-0019

Madzunya, N., Viljoen, K., & Cilliers, L. (2021). The effect of Instagram conspicuous consumptive behaviour on the intention to purchase luxury goods: A developing country’s perspective. SA Journal of Information Management, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1267

Mardon, R., & Belk, R. (2018). Materializing digital collecting: An extended view of digital materiality. Marketing Theory, 18(4), 543–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593118767725

Marwick, A. E. (2015a). Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379

Marwick, A. E. (2015b). Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379

Piliang, Y.A. (2020) Dunia yang dilipat : Tamasya Melampaui Batas Batas Kebudayaan. Cantrik Pustaka. Yogyakarta

Prown, J. D. (1982). Mind in Matter: An Introduction to Material Culture Theory and Method. Winterthur Portfolio, 17(1), 1–19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1180761

Rogers, R. (2021). Visual media analysis for Instagram and other online platforms. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211022370. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211022370

Wang, X., Sung, B., & Phau, I. (2024). How rarity and exclusivity influence types of perceived value for luxury. Journal of Brand Management, 31(6), 576–592. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-024-00359-8

Wilcox, C., & Currie, E. (2017). Bags. Thames & Hudson.

Yoo, J. J. (2023). Visual strategies of luxury and fast fashion brands on Instagram and their effects on user engagement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103517

Yu, J., & Xie, S. Y. (2026). Luxury in focus: Decoding image fluency and user engagement on social media. Journal of Business Research, 204, 115840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115840

Downloads

Published

2026-02-12

How to Cite

Resmisari, G. (2026). Konstruksi Identitas dan Kemewahan Digital di Instagram melalui Hermes Birkin sebagai False Commodity. Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.47134/dkv.v3i1.5454

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.