A Systematic Review of In Vitro Approaches for Evaluating Bioactive Natural Compound–Target Interactions in Early Drug Discovery

Authors

  • Gratia Apulina Cindylawsa Purba Institut Kesehatan Deli Husada Deli Tua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/scpr.v2i4.5320

Keywords:

In Vitro Methods, Bioactive Natural Compounds, Myristicin, Drug Discovery, Molecular Interactions

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review and analyze in vitro approaches for evaluating bioactive natural compound–target interactions in early drug discovery, with myristicin highlighted as a representative example. Employing a qualitative descriptive research design, this study utilized a library-based method through the comprehensive analysis of scientific articles, books, and reports published between 2015 and 2025. Data collection involved literature screening and document analysis from peer-reviewed journals, while data analysis followed an inductive thematic approach encompassing identification, reduction, categorization, and synthesis of findings. The results indicate that integrating in vitro assays with computational (in silico) modeling significantly enhances predictive accuracy, efficiency, and mechanistic understanding in early drug discovery. Myristicin demonstrated multitarget bioactivity, including anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anticancer effects, primarily through modulation of COX-2, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, and P-glycoprotein pathways. These findings reinforce the theoretical framework of polypharmacology, supporting the concept that natural compounds often act through multi-target interactions rather than single-receptor specificity. The study contributes to pharmacognosy and molecular pharmacology by providing a conceptual and methodological model for integrating experimental and computational drug discovery approaches. The implications extend to both academic and industrial domains, promoting standardized in vitro validation and translational research for natural product–based drug development.

References

Abraham, D., & P, P. (2024). A Methodological Framework for Descriptive Phenomenological Research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 47, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241308071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241308071

Ansory, H., Fitriani, I., Handayani, S., & Aznam, N. (2021). Synthesis of a novel chalcone derivative from myristicin for skin cancer preventive activity. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.31788/rjc.2021.1436312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31788/RJC.2021.1436312

Bandaranayake, P. (2024). Application of Grounded Theory Methodology in Library and Information Science Research: An Overview. Sri Lanka Library Review. https://doi.org/10.4038/sllr.v38i2.70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/sllr.v38i2.70

Bao, H., & Muge, Q. (2021). Anticancer effect of myristicin on hepatic carcinoma and related molecular mechanism. Pharmaceutical Biology, 59, 1124–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2021.1961825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2021.1961825

Belotto, M. (2018). Data Analysis Methods for Qualitative Research: Managing the Challenges of Coding, Interrater Reliability, and Thematic Analysis. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3492

Bingham, A. (2023). From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620

Cava, C., & Castiglioni, I. (2020). Integration of molecular docking and in vitro studies: A powerful approach for drug discovery in breast cancer. Applied Sciences, 10(19), 6981. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196981

Chunarkar-Patil, P., Kaleem, M., Mishra, R., Ray, S., Ahmad, A., Verma, D., Bhayye, S., Dubey, R., Singh, H., & Kumar, S. (2024). Anticancer drug discovery based on natural products: From computational approaches to clinical studies. Biomedicines, 12(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010201

De Almada-Vilhena, A., Santos, O., Machado, M., Nagamachi, C., & Pieczarka, J. (2024). Prospecting pharmacologically active biocompounds from the Amazon rainforest: In vitro approaches, mechanisms of action based on chemical structure, and perspectives on human therapeutic use. Pharmaceuticals, 17(11), 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17111449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17111449

De Sena Murteira Pinheiro, P., Franco, L., Montagnoli, T., & Fraga, C. (2024). Molecular hybridization: A powerful tool for multitarget drug discovery. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 19, 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2024.2322990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2024.2322990

Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2019). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25, 443–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234

Fife, S., & Gossner, J. (2024). Deductive Qualitative Analysis: Evaluating, Expanding, and Refining Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241244856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241244856

Foudah, A., Alqarni, M., Alam, A., Salkini, M., Ross, S., & Yusufoglu, H. (2022). Phytochemical screening, in vitro and in silico studies of volatile compounds from Petroselinum crispum (Mill) leaves grown in Saudi Arabia. Molecules, 27(3), 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030934

Granikov, V., Hong, Q., Crist, E., & Pluye, P. (2020). Mixed methods research in library and information science: A methodological review. Library & Information Science Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101003

Jimenez, S., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & De La Torre, R. (2024). How do university libraries contribute to the research process? The Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102930

Kalpokaite, N., & Radivojevic, I. (2018). Demystifying Qualitative Data Analysis for Novice Qualitative Researchers. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.4120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.4120

Khairy, A., Ghareeb, D., Celik, I., Hammoda, H., Zaatout, H., & Ibrahim, R. (2023). Forecasting of potential anti-inflammatory targets of some immunomodulatory plants and their constituents using in vitro, molecular docking, and network pharmacology-based analysis. Scientific Reports, 13, 36540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36540-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36540-3

Li, G., Peng, X., Guo, Y., Gong, S., Cao, S., & Qiu, F. (2021). Currently available strategies for target identification of bioactive natural products. Frontiers in Chemistry, 9, 761609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.761609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.761609

Mansouri, P., Mansouri, P., Najafipour, S., Kouhpayeh, S., Farjadfar, A., & Behmard, E. (2025). Comprehensive computational strategies for multi-target drug discovery in inflammatory bowel disease utilizing bioactive compounds. Scientific Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98771-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98771-w

Pang, X., Fu, W., Wang, J., Kang, D., Xu, L., Zhao, Y., Liu, A., & Du, G. (2018). Identification of estrogen receptor α antagonists from natural products via in vitro and in silico approaches. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6040149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6040149

Periwal, V., Bassler, S., Andrejev, S., Gabrielli, N., Patil, K., Typas, A., & Patil, K. (2022). Bioactivity assessment of natural compounds using machine learning models trained on target similarity between drugs. PLoS Computational Biology, 18(1), e1010029. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010029

Pradeep, S., Chakith, M., Sindhushree, S., Reddy, P., Sushmitha, E., Purohit, M., Suresh, D., Shivananju, N., Silina, E., Manturova, N., Stupin, V., Kollur, S., Shivamallu, C., & Achar, R. (2025). Exploring shared therapeutic targets for Alzheimer’s disease and glioblastoma using network pharmacology and protein–protein interaction approach. Frontiers in Chemistry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2025.1549186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2025.1549186

Pratt, M. (2025). On the Evolution of Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-111722-032953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-111722-032953

Sakle, N., More, S., & Mokale, S. (2020). A network pharmacology-based approach to explore potential targets of Caesalpinia pulcherima: An updated prototype in drug discovery. Scientific Reports, 10, 74251. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74251-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74251-1

Seneme, E., Santos, D., De Lima, C., Zelioli, Í., Sciani, J., & Longato, G. (2022). Effects of myristicin in association with chemotherapies on the reversal of the multidrug resistance (MDR) mechanism in cancer. Pharmaceuticals, 15, 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15101233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15101233

Shtaiwi, A., Khan, S., Khedraoui, M., Alaraj, M., Samadi, A., & Chtita, S. (2024). A comprehensive computational study to explore promising natural bioactive compounds targeting glycosyltransferase MurG in Escherichia coli for potential drug development. Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57702-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57702-x

Togia, A., & Malliari, A. (2017). Research Methods in Library and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68749

Ugbaja, S., Mushebenge, A., Kumalo, H., Ngcobo, M., & Gqaleni, N. (2025). Potential benefits of in silico methods: A promising alternative in natural compound’s drug discovery and repurposing for HBV therapy. Pharmaceuticals, 18(3), 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18030419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18030419

Vila-Henninger, L., Van Ingelgom, V., Caprioli, M., Teuber, F., Pennetreau, D., Bussi, M., & Gall, C. (2022). Abductive coding: Theory building and qualitative (re)analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(4), 968–1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211067508

Xu, R., Yu, H., Wang, Y., Li, B., Chen, Y., Liu, X., & Xu, T. (2024). Natural product virtual-interact-phenotypic target characterization: A novel approach demonstrated with Salvia miltiorrhiza extract. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 15, 101101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101101

Zhen, Z., Yin, L., Niu, T., Rehman, A., Liu, Y., & Zeng, K. (2025). Target discovery-directed pharmacological mechanism elucidation of bioactive natural products. Medical Review, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1515/mr-2024-0076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mr-2024-0076

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Purba, G. (2025). A Systematic Review of In Vitro Approaches for Evaluating Bioactive Natural Compound–Target Interactions in Early Drug Discovery. Sciences and Clinical Pharmacy Research Journal, 2(4), 11. https://doi.org/10.47134/scpr.v2i4.5320

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.