Pertanggungjawaban Hukum dan Kerugian Konsumen dalam Pemalsuan BBM: Studi Kasus Pemalsuan Pertamax di SPBU 34.151.39 Tangerang

Authors

  • Achmad Hafizh Sirait Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Dede Agus Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Jarkasi Anwar Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v3i1.5079

Keywords:

Fuel, Consumer, Consumer Protection, Gas Station, Law Number 8 of 1999

Abstract

This study aims to analyze consumer legal protection against Pertamax fuel This study examines the legal accountability of business actors and the losses suffered by consumers in the Pertamax fuel counterfeiting case at Gas Station 34.151.39 in Tangerang City. The research aims to analyze the extent of consumer protection, the legal responsibilities arising from the distribution of counterfeit fuel, and the violation of good faith principles in business practices. Using a qualitative method with a case study approach, data were obtained through in-depth interviews with consumers and relevant stakeholders, field observations, and analysis of regulatory documents and supervisory reports. The study applies Philipus M. Hadjon’s Legal Protection Theory, covering preventive, repressive, and remedial mechanisms. The findings reveal that fuel adulteration—such as mixing lower-grade fuel with coloring substances to resemble Pertamax—results in significant financial and technical losses, including engine damage and reduced vehicle performance. Legal protection remains ineffective due to weak supervision and limited enforcement against business actors. The gas station operator is legally obligated, under Article 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, to provide compensation through refunds, product replacement, or other statutory remedies. The study concludes that strengthening monitoring, imposing strict sanctions, and enhancing consumer awareness are essential to ensuring effective legal protection and safeguarding consumer rights in fuel distribution.

References

Amaliya, L., Dewi, S., Arafat, Z., Asyhadi, F., & Rosidawati, I. (2025). Marketplace Responsibilities and Sanctions in Cases of Consumer Losses (Futuristic Legal Perspective). JHK: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v2i3.318

Auberlet, J. M., Bhaskar, A., Ciuffo, B., Farah, H., Hoogendoorn, R., & Leonhardt, A. (2014). Data collection techniques. Traffic Simulation and Data. Validation Methods and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 5-32.

Cahya, A. N., & Sudiro, A. A. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen (Studi Kasus Informasi Flash Sale Menyesatkan Bagi Konsumen). Unes Law Review, 06(03), 7839–7849. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1694

Fadilah, K. (2024). Bareskrim Sita 29.046 Liter Pertamax Palsu dari 4 SPBU Jakarta-Depok. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7266533/bareskrim-sita-29-046-liter-pertamax-palsu-dari-4-spbu-jakarta-depok

Farahwati, M. I. S. dan. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Undang – Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 Tentang Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Terhadap Penjualan Bahan Bakar Minyak Oleh Pertamini Di Kota Samarinda. Legalitas, 7(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.31293/lg.v7i2.7591

Hamid, H. (2017). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama (Issue July). https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6V5tDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR2&dq=hukum&ots=eZ0AND8mLJ&sig=5HuI3IaNFbW_lGB0qBA0IoNYH7s

Hartono, R. I., & Laksito, H. (2022). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Fee Audit, Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Spesialisasi Auditor, Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 11(1981), 1–12.

Hutapea, Y., Fauzi, A., Dwiyanti, A., Ajeng Alifah, F., Andina, N., & Murtafia Dara Jati, S. (2024). Peran Manajemen Sekuriti Dalam Mencegah Resiko Kerugian Terhadap Keuangan Digital. Jurnal Kewirausahaan Dan Multi Talenta, 2(2), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.38035/jkmt.v2i2.162

Jumaidi, J., Sukristyanto, A., & Rochim, A. I. (2024). Polıcy On Prohıbıtıon Of Subsıdızed Fuel Tradıng In North Hulu Sungaı Regency, South Kalımantan Provınce. Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science, 4(02), 794–807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63922/ajmesc.v4i02.809

Lailatuz, A., Fitriana, Z., Pakih, I., Maromi, N., & Kamila, S. (2024). Praktik Pembulatan Harga Dalam Jual Beli BBM di SPBU Perspektif UU Nomor 8 Tahun 1999. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Published by Yayasan Daarul Huda Krueng Mane, 2(4), 580. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14241872

Laksmana, A. (2024). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Praktik Pembulatan Harga BBM Di SPBU: Perspektif UU Perlindungan Konsumen. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM. http://digilib.iblam.ac.id/id/eprint/1419/%0Ahttp://digilib.iblam.ac.id/id/eprint/1419/1/Jurnal Laksmana Adzani.pdf

Muhammad Fauji, Anwar Hafidzi, & M. Hanafiah. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Islam Tentang Praktik Pembulatan Nominal Harga Dalam Pembelian Bahan Bakar Minyak (BBM) Di SPBU Banjarmasin. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v2i1.241

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855

Nurahman, D., Dewi, S., Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas Kusumawardhani, D., Penelitian, A., Pertamax, P., Pidana, H., Migas, U.-U., Pidana, T., & Bakar, B. (2025). Analisis Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pemalsuan Pertamax dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Migas Criminal Law Analysis of Pertamax Counterfeiters from the Perspective of the Oil and Gas Law. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(3), 1413–1419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i2.7185

Philipus M. Hadjon. (2008). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, (Issue 2002). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Pradana, F., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Arthanaya, I. W. (2021). Implementasi Pasal 53 Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi Terkait Pelaku Usaha Pertamini di Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(2), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.2.3268.429-433

Primadona, F., & Rizaldi, I. T. (2021). Kajian Dampak Penghapusan BBM Pertalite terhadap Profitabilitas PT Pertamina Tahun 2021. El-Mal: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi & Bisnis Islam, 2(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.47467/elmal.v2i2.954

Putra, J. M., & Menorizah, M. (2025). An Analysis of the Use of the MyPertamina Application in Reducing the Misuse of Government-Subsidised Pertalite (A Literature Review). JERIT: Journal of Educational Research and Innovation Technology, 2(2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.34125/jerit.v2i2.30

Ramadhan, A. O., Rohaeni, R., Mujadilah, M., & Fartini, A. (2025). Aspek Hukum Pidana Dalam Kasus Oplosan BBM: Penerapan Sanksi Tindak Pidana BBM. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(5), 10549–10559.

Silalahi, D. F., Blakers, A., Stocks, M., Lu, B., Cheng, C., & Hayes, L. (2021). Indonesia’s vast solar energy potential. Energies, 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175424

Slamet, Subekti, & Soekorini, N. (2023). Law Enforcement on Perpetrators of Fuel Oil and Gas Counterfeiting in Bangilan, Tuban. Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v2i1.272

Sulistiono, D. (2025). Peran Hukum Dalam Mengatasi Penyalahgunaan Distribusi Bbm Bersubsidi the Role of Law in Overcoming Abuse of Subsidized Fuel Distribution. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47353/bj.v4i11.527

Syauqi, A., Pratama, Y. W., & Purwanto, W. W. (2021). Sustainable Energy System in the Archipelagic Country: Challenges and Opportunities. Green Energy and Technology, 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67529-5_3

Zhafari, F. R. (2024). Pelanggaran Hukum Terhadap Hak Konsumen oleh Pelaku Usaha Pada Marketplace Dengan Tidak Memberikan Informasi Mengenai Produk Secara Jelas. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 9633–9639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1910

Downloads

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

Sirait, A. H., Agus, D., & Anwar, J. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum dan Kerugian Konsumen dalam Pemalsuan BBM: Studi Kasus Pemalsuan Pertamax di SPBU 34.151.39 Tangerang. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 3(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v3i1.5079

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.