Analisis Post Positivisme Hukum Pada Paradigma Guba And Lincoln Melalui Putusan Mk No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Terhadap Syarat Usia Capres-Cawapres
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i1.3239Keywords:
Constitutional Court, post-positivism, presidential age requirementAbstract
This study aims to analyze the legal implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the minimum age requirement for presidential and vice-presidential candidates under Article 169 (q) of the Election Law, viewed as discriminatory against younger candidates with leadership potential. Using a post-positivist approach within the Guba and Lincoln paradigm, this research examines the Court’s role in either upholding or reforming legal norms to align with social dynamics. The method employed is a literature study and qualitative analysis, describing the post-positivist perspective in legal philosophy as a foundation for evaluating the constitutionality of the age requirement. The findings indicate that the Court proposes an alternative criterion—leadership experience as a regional head—as a substitute for the minimum age requirement, considering relevant social changes. The post-positivist approach emphasizes that law is not a static system but a social construct that must adapt to moral and cultural contexts. In conclusion, legal norms must be flexible and capable of re-evaluation in evolving social situations to maintain fairness and relevance in democratic processes. This decision demonstrates that Indonesia’s legal framework needs to accommodate youth participation in government without imposing discriminatory restrictions.
References
Agustian, T., Setiawati, D., & Alexander, O. (2023). Problematika Pengangkatan dan Perberhentian Hakim Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Mahkamah Agung Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia. Hutanasyah : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 1(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.37092/hutanasyah.v1i2.514
Amalia, D. S. (2022). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Dalam Menguji Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar. Fenomena, 20(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.36841/fenomena.v20i2.2401
Cahyawati, D. P., & Azharil, A. (2019). Lahirnya Norma Baru Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/siclj.v3i2.13866
Hanadi, S. (2019). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menafsir Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 16(1), 349. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v16i1.92
Helmi, M. (2020). Ontologi Penelitian Hukum Islam Berbasis Paradigma Guba dan Lincoln. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 18(1), 1. http://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/jhi/article/view/2672
Konradus, D. (2017). Politik Hukum Berdasarkan Konstitusi. In Masalah-Masalah Hukum (Vol. 45, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.3.2016.199-207
Lailam, T. (2016). Pro-Kontra Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang yang Mengatur Eksistensinya. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(4), 795. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1247
Marilang, M. (2017). Menimbang Paradigma Keadilan Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(2), 315. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1424
Masrufah, & Wibowo, A. (2023). Kedudukan Dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.108
Muqsitha, S., & Wibowo, A. (2023). Keberadaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.81
Prasetya, R. G. (2017). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945 Oleh. Jurnal Hukum Responsif Fh Unpab, 5(5), 103.
Sasan, V J. M. (2021). The The Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative Analysis. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 9(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v9i1.4042
Siswoko, H. (2022). Kewenangan Hak Menguji Undang-Undang Terhadap Konstitusi Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menciptakan Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis. Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v11i1.2663
Sutiyoso, B. (2016). Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(6), 025. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk762
Teguh, P. P., Bachmid, F., & Rumadhan, I. (2022). Kewenangan Mahkamah Agung Sebagai Pelaksana Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Independen Dalam Rekruitmen Hakim. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 11(2), 343. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.343-364
Wardhana, A. F. G. (2014). PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA 1945 MELALUI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: STUDI TERHADAP PUTUSAN NOMOR 92/PUU-X/2012. JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 21(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss2.art5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rizki Rahayu Fitri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
