Analisis Yuridis Pasal 112 dan Pasal 127 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika: Upaya Reformulasi untuk Menjamin Kepastian Hukum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i2.2275Keywords:
Legal certainty, Narcotics law, Overlap, Legal reformAbstract
This study aims to analyze the legal relationship between Article 112 and Article 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, focusing on formulating legal provisions that ensure legal certainty. The research adopts a normative legal method, employing approaches based on statutory regulations, conceptual analysis, and case studies. The findings reveal an overlap between the provisions of Article 112, which stipulates sanctions for drug distributors, and Article 127, which provides lighter sanctions, including rehabilitation, for drug abusers. The ambiguity in Article 112, particularly regarding narcotics usage, has led to prolonged debates and inconsistent application. This overlap has resulted in subjective interpretations by law enforcement officials, emphasizing the need for reformulated provisions grounded in the principles of lex certa and lex scripta. The study concludes that Article 112 should specifically address narcotics distributors, while Article 127 should focus on drug abusers, clarifying that the sanctions for abusers should prioritize rehabilitation measures. Such reformulation is essential to address legal uncertainty, reduce interpretative conflicts, and ensure proportional justice for narcotics offenders based on their roles and levels of culpability. These recommendations aim to foster a more consistent legal framework, enhancing the effectiveness of narcotics law enforcement while safeguarding the rights of justice seekers.
References
Aneta, F., Zulfiko, R., & Adriaman, M. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Dan Kepastian Hukum Antara Pasal 112 Dan Pasal 127 Uu Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Sumbang12 Law Journal. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/smb12lj/article/view/5754%0Ahttps://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/smb12lj/article/download/5754/3891
Anggoro, Wahyu R. (2024). Tindak Pidana Tanpa Hak atau Melawan Hukum dengan Jual Beli Narkotika Golongan I Bukan Tanaman. Syntax Idea, 6(2), 981–990. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i2.2902
Efendi, J. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris.
Fadhil, M. (2024). Analisis Penggunaan Pasal 112 Dan Pasal 127 Undang-Undang Narkotika Kepada Penyalahguna Narkotika Golongan 1 Bukan Tanaman. Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari’ah Law, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v7i1.11187
Kalo, S., Mulyadi, M., Ikhsan, E., & Rahmadhani, F. (2021). Penuntutan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahguna Narkotika Di Luar Golongan Yang Di Atur Dalam Lampiran Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i3.153
Malik, F. (2019). Pengaturan Norma Eksekusi Terpidana Mati Narkotika Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Cakrawala Hukum, 21(2), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.51921/chk.6jdtgm39
Mulyono, H. (2023). Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pasal 112 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Recidive, 12(35), 281–293.
Nur Tsani, I. F., & Ginting, R. (2021). TINJAUAN YURIDIS FRASA TANPA HAK ATAU MELAWAN HUKUM MEMILIKI MENYIMPAN MENGUASAI NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan No. 1825/Pid.Sus/2019/PN. Jkt Brt). Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 10(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v10i1.58863
Pradnyantari, M. R., Suryawan, I. G. B., & Sujana, I. N. (2021). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.3043.11-15
Pratama, D. S. S., Chandra, T. Y., & Ismed, M. (2024). Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Justice Collaborator Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(6), 2649–2659. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v3i6.2885
Rahmanto, T. Y. (2017). Kepastian Hukum Bagi Pengguna Penyalahgunaan Narkotika: Studi Kasus Di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17(2), 265. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.v17.265-282
Sabariah, S., & Dewi, G. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Bagi Anak Dibawah Umur (Sinkronisasi Norma Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(3), 1945–1956. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i3.1531
Sakah Sumaragatha, I. G. B. S., Saputra, O., Swarnagita, S., Ginastini, N. L., & Wardi, H. S. (2021). Politik Hukum Dalam Penanggulangan Pecandu Narkotika. Journal Kompilasi Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v6i2.80
Suryono, A. R., & Ratnawati, E. (2022). Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Penjara Tanpa Rehabilitasi Terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika. Law, Development and Justice Review, 5(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v5i2.17170
Susila, Dharma, G. N. A., & Surya Dharma Jaya, I. B. (2020). PENGATURAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PECANDU DAN PENYALAH GUNA NARKOTIKA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(10), 1504. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2020.v08.i10.p02
Waldo, R., & Oktarina, S. (2024). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Berdasarkan Pasal 112 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika (Analisa Putusan Nomor: 4109 K/Pid.Sus/2020). Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v7i2.45856
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Agus Sukma Hariyawan, Sagung Putri M.E. Purwani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
