Analisis Keabsahan Pernikahan Campuran Sesama Jenis di Luar Negeri Ditinjau dari Hukum Perdata Nasional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i3.2102Keywords:
Perkawinan, Perkawinan Campuran Sesama Jenis, Ragil MahardikaAbstract
Perkawinan Sesama Jenis di Indonesia, sejatinya belum diatur oleh Peraturan Perundang-Undangan sehingga banyak pasangan sesama jenis yang memilih menikah di luar negeri contohnya Ragil. Ragil Mahardika menikah dengan seorang pria Jerman berusia 35 tahun yaitu Frederik Vollert. Keduanya menikah di Jerman, negara yang memungkinkan persatuan sesama jenis. Setelah menikah, keduanya tinggal di Bayern, Jerman. Perkawinan yang telah dilakukan oleh Ragil Mahardika sudah jelas merupakan perkawinan sesama jenis, perkawinan ini tergolong perkawinan beda kewarganegaraan dikarenakan Ragil Mahardika terlebih dahulu menikah dengan Frederik Mollert pada tahun 2018 yang kemudian disusul pindah kewarganegaraan menjadi Warga Negara Jerman pada tahun 2021. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui prosedur perkawinan antar bangsa menurut Hukum Perdata Internasional serta untuk mengetahui keabsahan perkawinan campuran sesama jenis yang dilakukan di luar Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian normatif, dengan jenis penelitian yang digunakan ialah penelitian deskriptif dan teknik pengumpulan data dilalukan melalui studi kepustakaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori hukum perdata internasional yang dimana didalamnya telah memuat fakta yang valid atau relevan baik dalam aspek subjek hukumnya maupun dalam aspek objektifnya. Hasil penelitian ini dapat menemukan fakta bahwa perkawinan sesama jenis pada pasal 1 Undang-Undang Perkawinan berbunyi demikian: “Perkawinan ialah ikatan lahir bathin antara seorang pria dengan seorang wanita sebagai suami isteri dengan tujuan membentuk keluarga (rumah tangga) yang bahagia dan kekal berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha esa”. Menurut pasal tersebut pasangan sesama jenis, baik gay atau homoseksual (pasangan pria dengan pria) maupun lesbian (pasangan wanita dengan wanita), tidak sah menurut hukum perkawinan Indonesia
References
Alfikry, A. H. (2021). National Law Development through Civil Procedure Law Reform as a Manifestation of State Goals during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Lex Scientia Law Review, 5(2), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i2.50483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i2.50483
Amayuelas, E. A. (2023). Civil Law in Spain is Plural, as Are Its National Civil Codes. Ius Gentium, 104, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4993-7_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4993-7_3
Bell, G. F. (2019). Teaching more civil law at the National University of Singapore: A necessity for Singapore as a legal hub for Asia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1017/ASJCL.2019.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2019.20
Carpenter, C. S. (2021). Effects of Access to Legal Same-Sex Marriage on Marriage and Health. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(2), 376–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22286
Ferentz, L. M. D. S. (2020). State capacity in risk and disaster management after the national policy of protection and civil defense (Law 12.608/2012). Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas, 10(1), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.5102/RBPP.V10I1.6550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v10i1.6550
Fredriksen, H. H. (2023). Impact of the ELI/UNIDROIT European Model Rules for Civil Procedure on National Law – the Case of Norway. Oslo Law Review, 9(3), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.18261/OLR.9.3.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/olr.9.3.1
Gautama, S. (1985). Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Internasional. Alumni.
Gutiérrez, L. G. (2019). Succession Of A British National Resident In Spain: Renvoi, Again, As A Decisive Element Between Freedom To Make A Will And The Legitimate Successory Rights, Typical Of The Spanish Common Civil Law. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 11(2), 616–623. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2019.4981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2019.4981
Hartono, S. (1976). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata Internasional. Alumni.
Ho, M. S. (2019). Taiwan’s Road to Marriage Equality: Politics of Legalizing Same-sex Marriage. China Quarterly, 238, 482–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741018001765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741018001765
Ko, N. Y. (2020). Associations of perceived socially unfavorable attitudes toward homosexuality and same-sex marriage with suicidal ideation in Taiwanese people before and after same-sex marriage referendums. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031047
Kolk, M. (2020). Two Decades of Same-Sex Marriage in Sweden: A Demographic Account of Developments in Marriage, Childbearing, and Divorce. Demography, 57(1), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00847-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00847-6
Lee, H. (2019). Changing Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage: A Three-Wave Panel Study. Political Behavior, 41(3), 701–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9463-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9463-7
Marzuki, P. M. (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Group.
Mos, M. (2020). The anticipatory politics of homophobia: explaining constitutional bans on same-sex marriage in post-communist Europe. East European Politics, 36(3), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1733983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1733983
Ofosu, E. K. (2019). Same-sex marriage legalization associated with reduced implicit and explicit antigay bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(18), 8846–8851. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806000116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806000116
Ogolsky, B. G. (2019). As the states turned: Implications of the changing legal context of same-sex marriage on well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(10), 3219–3238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518816883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518816883
Ortiz-Pradillo, J. C. (2020). International jurisdiction and provisional measures: Towards a common interim justice in European civil procedure converging on national laws. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 12(2), 1337–1357. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5674
Petrlík, D. (2020). “Enforcement of Patent Law in Civil Proceedings” - A Conference Report on the Fifth Bi-national Seminar of TU Dresden and Charles University in Prague, 26 November 2019. GRUR International, 69(6), 624–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa051
Prihatini, L., Wijaya, M. M., & dkk. (2021). ASPEK HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN HEWAN DI INDONESIA. Pakuan Law Review, 07(mor 02). https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v7i2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v7i2.3582
Qotrun, A., Teori, K., Pengertian, C., & Membuat, C. (2023). Gramedia Blog. https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/
Sansone, D. (2019). Pink work: Same-sex marriage, employment and discrimination. Journal of Public Economics, 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104086
Sari, S. P. (2022). Profil dan Profesi Frederik Vollert, Suami Ragil Mahardika. Sindonews, 1652270758 10. https://lifestyle.sindonews.com/rea
Syahar, S. (1976). Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan Masalah Pelaksanaannya Ditinjau Dari Segi Hukum Islam. Alumni.
Turitsyn, A. V. (2019). Smart contract as a new form of civil law contracts: National and international approaches to comprehension and regulation of the legal institution. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 826, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_19
Twenge, J. M. (2021). Increased Support for Same-sex Marriage in the US: Disentangling Age, Period, and Cohort Effects. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(11), 1774–1784. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1705672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1705672
Undang-Undang. (1974). Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. In LN 1974/ No.1, TLN No.3019, LL SETNEG: 26 HLM.
Undang-Undang, I. (2006). Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan. In LN.2006/NO.124, TLN NO.4674, LL SETNEG: 52 HLM.
Undang-Undang, I. (2019). Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. In LN.2019/NO.186, TLN NO.6401, JDIH.SETNEG.GO.ID: 4 HLM.
Zygmont, A. (2023). “MARTYRS FOR GOD AND SPAIN” NATIONAL MARTYRDOM IN SPAIN FROM THE CIVIL WAR TO THE HISTORICAL MEMORY LAW. Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki, 7(1), 128–164. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2023-1-128-164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2023-1-128-164
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ananta Dwi Prayoga, Silvi Ristia, M Rahmad Arief, Reza Akbar Nugarah, Marcelina Fitriani P

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.