Peranan Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menjaga Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v3i3.5734Keywords:
constitutional court, procedural law, judicial review, constitutionalism, constitutional justiceAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of the Constitutional Court’s procedural law in upholding constitutionalism in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research with a qualitative approach through a literature review, utilizing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The data was analyzed systematically to understand the authority, functions, and practices of the Constitutional Court within the constitutional system. The results of the study indicate that the Constitutional Court plays a strategic role as a guardian of the constitution through its authority to review laws against the 1945 Constitution, resolve disputes over the authority of state institutions, dissolve political parties, and address disputes regarding election results. The Constitutional Court’s procedural law serves as a crucial guideline to ensure that the review process and decision-making proceed effectively, transparently, and fairly. Additionally, the Constitutional Court plays a role in the impeachment mechanism as a balancing force between legal and political aspects. However, challenges exist in the form of unclear boundaries between legal and political considerations, as well as inconsistencies in the interpretation of legal standing and constitutional harm. This necessitates the strengthening of judicial standards and the consistency of rulings to maintain the institution’s legitimacy and reinforce the supremacy of the constitution and democracy.
References
Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar, SH., M. L. (2017). KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR TAHUN 1945. Jurnal Hukum Responsif FH UNPAB, 5(5), 100–108.
Alarode Lahoya Simbolon, & Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna. (2025). Analisis Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi: Implikasi Putusan terhadap Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia. RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 3(3), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i3.770
Amindoni, A. (2020). UU Cipta Kerja: Kesalahan “fatal” pasal-pasal Omnibus Law akibat “proses legislasi ugal-ugalan”, apakah UU layak dibatalkan? BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-54768000.amp
Andrian, R., Pulungan, R., W, L. T. A. L., Hukum, P. M., Hukum, F., & Diponegoro, U. (2022). Mekanisme Pelaksanaan Prinsip Checks And Balances Antara Lembaga Legislatif Dan Eksekutif Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. 4.
Arfandy, M. F., & Maharani, A. R. (2026). Pergeseran Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum TSM: Analisis Hukum dan Konstitusional. Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 4(1), 100–132. https://doi.org/10.70308/adagium.v4i1.281
Arsil, F., & Ayuni, Q. (2022). Kedudukan Hukum Khusus dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(4), 957–980. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk19410
Aulia Mahenda. (2025). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menjaga Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang di Indonesia. JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin, 3(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.59945/jpnm.v3i2.454
Devi Anggreni. SY, Ahmad Fuadi, Fitriyani, M. I. A.-K. (2024). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menjamin Kedaulatan Hukum di Indonesia. Hutanasyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 3. https://jurnal.staibsllg.ac.id/index.php/hutanasyah/article/view/868/415
Fakhlevi, R. F., Asnawi, E., & Kadaryanto, B. (2025). KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILU BERDASARKAN HUKUM. IX(1), 196–204.
Hariri, A. (2025). Analysis And Challenges Of Unimplemented Constitutional Court Decisions By Legislators. 5(1), 1–24.
Hidayah, A. N. (2025). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tatanegara Di Indonesia. Lentera Ilmu, 2(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.59971/li.v1i1.73
Islami, N. N., & Riwanto, A. (2023). EKSISTENSI KEDUDUKAN SERTA PERAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PEMAKZULAN ( IMPEACHMENT ) PRESIDEN DAN / ATAU WAKIL PRESIDEN PASCA AMANDEMEN UUD NRI 1945. 210–218.
Isnaeni, B. (2021). Trias Politica dan Implikasinya dalam Struktur Kelembagaan Negara dalam UUD 1945 Pasca Amandemen. VI(2), 78–91.
JDIH Setjen DPD RI. (2024). Perbedaan Wewenang DPR, MA, dan MK dalam Perubahan Undang-Undang (p. 1). https://jdih.dpd.go.id/berita-hukum/view?id=10#
Juwita, & M, M. H. (2025). Konstitusionalitas dan pembatasan konstitusionalisme kewenangan mahkamah konstitusi mengadili perselisihan hasil pemilihan kepala daerah. Nomokrasi : Jurnal Ledhak Fakultas Hukum UNHAS, 3(2), 262–274.
Kurniawan, A. (2023). Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mekanisme Impeachment : Studi Komparasi Negara Republik Indonesia dan Republik Federal Jerman Pendahuluan pemerintahannya berdasarkan atas hukum atau rechtstaat memperjelas. 3(2).
Mungawanah, N., Taufiq, M., Lubis, A. F., & Jaya, K. (2024). Analisis Hukum Tentang Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Legal Analysis of the Role of the Constitutional Court in Testing Legislation. 8(2), 1257–1263. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i2.7141
Nurbaningsih, E. (2025). KONSTITUSI DAN KONSTITUSIONALISME. https://pusdik.mkri.id/materi/materi_365_1. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalime - Prof. Enny Nurbaningsih.pdf
Oktapani, S., Rahamadani, W., & Suyeni. (2025). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menjamin Konstitusionalitas Pembentukan Undang-Undang di Indonesia. Jurnal Niara, 18(1), 202–216. https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/nia/article/view/27395/7715
Rosa Ristawati, R. S. (2023). The Role of The Indonesian Constitutional Court in Preventing Social Conflict in A Diverse Society. 9(2). https://consrev.mkri.id/index.php/const-rev/article/view/925/5
Roux, T. (2018). Indonesia ’ s Judicial Review Regime in Comparative Perspective. 4(2). https://consrev.mkri.id/index.php/const-rev/article/view/422/pdf
Setiawan, Z. (2024). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menjaga Stabilitas Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cerdas Hukum, 2(2), 19–25. https://jurnal.staibsllg.ac.id/index.php/hutanasyah/article/view/868/415
Simanjuntak, S. H., & A.L.W., L. T. (2022). Procedural Justice or Substantive Justice: Review of Constitutional Court Decision Number: 91/Puu/Xviii/2020. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 16(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2022.v16.341-362
Sinaulan, R. L., & Saputra, R. (2025). The Constitutional Court as a Positive Legislative through the Living Constitution Approach.
Sugiarto, E., Oscar, V., Simanungkalit, D. S., Wijaya, U., Surabaya, K., Dukuh, J., Xxv, K., 54, N., Surabaya, J., & Timur, I. (2024). MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MENEGAKKAN KEADILAN KONSTITUSIONAL DI ERA MODERN. Issn (E), 8(1), 2580–3883. https://journal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/LS/article/view/9643/3112
Tan, D. (2021). NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. 8(8), 2463–2478.
Wantu, F. M., Nggilu, N. M., Imran, S., Hukum, F., Negeri, U., Gorontalo, K., Teguh, R., & Gobel, S. (2021). Proses Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi : Problematika dan Model Ke Depan Constitutional Judge Selection Process : Problems and Future Models. 18. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/download/1820/pdf/4428?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum : Studi Eksploratif di Indonesia. 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alika Hania Auliya, Dedi Mulyadi, Fawazi Rihadatulaisy Mulyadi, Mustika Hidayat, Yasmin Khairunisa , Yudha Adhipratama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
