Tinjauan Hukum Kedudukan Informasi Mengenai Situasi Legal Pemohon Suaka Diplomatik dalam Pemberian Suaka Diplomatik Berdasarkan Caracas Convention on Diplomatic Asylum 1954
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.4007Keywords:
Diplomatic Asylum; , Legal Information; , Caracas Convention; , Applicant StatusAbstract
This research focuses on addressing one of the gray areas in the practice of diplomatic asylum: the legal standing of information regarding the applicant's legal situation, compiled by the receiving state, and used as a consideration in granting asylum upon the request of the sending state, based on the Caracas Convention on Diplomatic Asylum (1955). In practice, the asylum-granting state has no obligation to allow intervention in evaluating the applicant’s condition. This results in broad discretionary authority for the sending state to unilaterally interpret the legitimacy of diplomatic asylum. This study employs a normative juridical method, relying on literature review and secondary data sources such as relevant international conventions and state practice. The findings show that the Caracas Convention does not explicitly require the receiving state to provide information or allow intervention in the evaluation process conducted by the sending state, nor does it obligate the sending state to request such information.In the absence of legal status information, the sending state may interpret the applicant’s situation based on its own political or legal considerations. This often hampers judicial processes in the receiving state and risks undermining the validity of diplomatic asylum granted to the applicant. As a recommendation, the establishment of a specific international guideline or instrument is necessary to serve as a formal reference for sending states in carefully evaluating the eligibility and status of individuals seeking diplomatic asylum.
References
Pinasthika Puspitaningrum. (2020). Analisis Hukum Internasional Terhadap Pemberian Suaka Diplomatik Kepada Julian Assange Oleh Kedutaan Besar Ekuador Di Inggris. In Belli Ac Pacis (Vol. 6, Issue 2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/belli.v6i2
BBC News. (2012a). Julian Assange: Why Ecuador is Offering Asylum. Https://Www.Bbc.Com/News/World-Europe-19289649.
BBC News. (2012b). Venezuelan Coup Leader Given Asylum. Http://News.Bbc.Co.Uk/2/Hi/Americas/2009907.Stm.
Caracas Convention on Diplomatic Asylum. (1954).
Gunardi (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum. https://lintar.untar.ac.id/repository/penelitian/buktipenelitian_10287001_11B030924141233.pdf
Elieen Denza. (2016). Diplomatic Law: Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
Gede, I., Suastama, P. N., Nyoman, I., Budiartha, P., Gusti, I., Ayu, A., & Dinar, G. P. (2023). Pemberian Suaka Diplomatik Berkaitan Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4(1), 2746–5047. https://doi.org/10.55637/juinhum.4.1.6747.7-13
Guardian. (2013). Bolivian senator’s bolt to Brazil Sparks Diplomatic Row. Https://Www.Theguardian.Com/World/2013/Aug/27/Bolivian-Senator-Brazil-Diplomatic.
Hasan, L. K., Naftalie, L. A., & Gunadi, A. (2025). Diplomatic Asylum in International Law: A Comprehensive Study of the Threshold of Diplomatic Asylum Between States. https://doi.org/10.57235/helium.v2i1.4918
Justinar, J. (2019). PEMBERIAN SUAKA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM DIPLOMATIK. https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/hpph/article/view/5462/4318
Kusuma, W., Kurnia, Ac., Terpadu Balunijuk, K., Merawang, K., & Bangka Provinsi Bangka Belitung, K. (2022). Pemberian Suaka Diplomatik Dalam Pengaturan Hukum Internasional. Rio Law Journal, 50. https://doi.org/10.36355/.v1i2
Nagieva, A. A., & Tkacheva, V. V. (2024). The History of the Formation and Development of the Institution of Diplomatic Asylum in Latin America. Kutafin Law Review, 11(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.1.27.050-069
Paul Behrens. (2017). Diplomatic Law in A New Millennium
ICJ. (2024). Pending Cases ICJ (Glas Espinel, Ecuador vs Mexico). https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/195/195-20240429-app-01-00-en.pdf
Putri, J., & Arsika, I. M. B. (2022). Pemberian Suaka Diplomatik dalam Hukum Internasional: Dilema antara Aspek Kemanusiaan dan Tensi Hubungan Bilateral. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.2.293-323
Reuters. (2021). Belarus Athlete Enters Poland’s Embassy in Tokyo After Refusing to Return Home. Https://Www.Reuters.Com/Lifestyle/Sports/Belarus-Athlete-in-Hands-Authorities-Ioc-2021-08-02/.
ŞENER, M. B. (2021). A Review of the Meaning and Importance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. International Journal of Political Studies, 7(3), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.25272/icps.962292
Stamatopoulou, E. (1998). The Development of United Nations Mechanisms for the The Development of United Nations Mechanisms for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Protection and Promotion of Human Rights. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol55/iss3/4
Sumaryo Suryokusumo. (1995). Hukum Diplomatik Teori dan Kasus. Alumni.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).
Värk, R. (2012). Diplomatic Asylum: Theory, Practice and the Case of Julian Assange. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2693958
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lasman Lasman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.