Protes Mahasiswa Terhadap UU Cipta Kerja

Azalia Zalfa Azura; Dianti Ramadhani Sa’di; Ibtisamah Laila; Titta Sara Oktaviani Sidauruk; Rakhmah Fakhriani; Dadi Mulyadi Nugraha

doi:10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2125

Authors

Azalia Zalfa Azura Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Dianti Ramadhani Sa’di Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Ibtisamah Laila Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Titta Sara Oktaviani Sidauruk Universitas Jambi
Rakhmah Fakhriani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Dadi Mulyadi Nugraha Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2125

Keywords:

Ketidakpatuhan Sipil, Mahasiswa, Hoax, Media Sosial

Abstract

Ide terbaru dalam proses legislatif Indonesia adalahhukum omnibus. Hukum omnibus, yang menggabungkan beberapa hukum menjadi satuperaturan, disebut sebagai "universum broom." Hukum Omnibus melayani tujuan yang berguna dalammenyederhanakan peraturan yang dianggap rumit, tidak jelas, dan tidak efektif. Ketidaksetujuan publikterhadap perubahan ini tidak disebabkan oleh batas waktu 100 hari Presiden Jokowi atau kurangnyapartisipasi dari banyak pihak dalam proses; sebaliknya, itu adalah hasil dari faktor-faktor pentingyang harus diperhitungkan karena mereka adalah salah satu kekhawatiran utama dari rancangan undang-undang. Berikut adalah analisis dan hasil yang didapatdari penelitian iniUndang-Undang Cipta Kerjamenimbulkan berbagai gejolak pada saat disahkankarena menimbulkan kerancuan dan kebingungan bagisemua pihak baik dari masyarakat, pelaku usaha, akademisi, pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah. Aksi demonstrasi yang dilakukan untuk menolakpengesahan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja diikuti oleh berbagai macamelemen, salah satunya masyarakat sipil. Masyarakat sipil ini terdiri dari beberapa gerakan, yaitu gerakandari non pemerintah seperti serikat buruh, aliansimahasiswa serta elemen masyarakat lainnya. Aksi inijuga didukung oleh FRI (Fraksi Rakyat Indonesia) yang menyatukan 40 organisasi ke dalam aliansi untukmenolak Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentangCipta Kerja.

References

Achmad, R. F., Febrianita, R., Permatasari, M. S., & Wong, C. D. F. (2022). Refleksi Demokrasi di Indonesia: Demonstrasi Menolak UU Cipta Kerja dalam Media Berita Online. JCommsci-Journal of Media and Communication Science, 5(1), 12–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jcommsci.v5i1.156

Adams, Z. (2020). Work and works on digital platforms in capitalism: conceptual and regulatory challenges for labour and copyright law. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 28(4), 329–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaa017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaa017

Az Zahra, H., & Fauzi, A. M. (2021). Dampak Sosial Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, 15(1), Maret 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v15i1.10294

Brzózka, K. (2021). Linking to Works Protected by Copyright – Influence of the Case Law of the Court of Justice on Judicial Practice of Polish Courts. Forum Prawnicze, 2021(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.32082/fp.v0i1(63).291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32082/fp.v0i1(63).291

Cekanavicius, A. (2019). Comparing concepts of originality in EU, Lithuanian, and US law: Photographs, news clips, databases, plot lines, TV formats, and other new uses of copyright works. Cambridge Handbook of Intellectual Property in Central and Eastern Europe, 80–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316661253.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316661253.006

Chronis, A. (2019). The inky ambiguity of tattoo copyrights: Addressing the silence of U.S. Copyright law on tattooed works. Iowa Law Review, 104(3), 1483–1521.

Dai, Z. (2023). The copyright protection of AI-generated works under Chinese law. Juridical Tribune, 13(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/2.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/2.05

Erratum: Copyright in “contest-created” works: Ugandan Court of Appeal weighs private interests and public benefit vis-à-vis Uganda’s national anthem (Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2019) DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpz133). (2020). Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 15(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz152

Gultom, F., & Fauzi, A. M. (2021). Demo Penolakan RUU Cipta Kerja dalam Kacamata Teori Konflik Sosiologi. Journal of Law, 4(1), April 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/doktrina.v4i1.4868

Hasse. (2012). Anarkisme Demonstrasi Mahasiswa: Studi Kasus Pada Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 3(1), Februari 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2012.0004

Iaia, V. (2022). To Be, or Not to Be ... Original Under Copyright Law, That Is (One of) the Main Questions Concerning AI-Produced Works. GRUR International, 71(9), 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac087

Iljadica, M. (2019). Works and walls: Graffiti writing and street art at the intersection of copyright and land law. The Cambridge Handbook of Copyright in Street Art and Graffiti, 81–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108563581.007

Jiwandono, I. S., & Oktaviyanti, I. (2022). Analisis Aksi Demonstrasi Mahasiswa Menolak RUU KUHP dan RUU KPK: Antara Sikap Kritis dan Narsis. Jurnal Asketik, 4(1), Juli 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v4i1.1000

Kansil, C. S. T. (2021). Urgency Of Protection Of Communal Rights Of The Community Of Yogyakarta Central Java On The Copyright Of The Traditional Architecture Works Reviewed Under Law Number 28 Of 2014 Regarding Copyright. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24, 1–9.

Khair, M. H. M. (2021). Exploring the suitability of Chesbrough’s open innovation concept for the exploitation and management of orphan works under copyright law. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 11(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2021.114601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2021.114601

Kurniawan, F. (2020). Problematika Pembentukan RUU Cipta Kerja Dengan Konsep Omnibus Law Pada Cluster Ketenagakerjaan Pasal 89 Angka 45 Tentang Pemberian Pesangon Kepada Pekerja Yang di PHK. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 5(1), Juni 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v5i1.4437

Li, J. (2019). Amending Chinese Copyright Law to Fulfil Obligations under the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for the Print Disabled. China Quarterly, 240, 1066–1086. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574101900033X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574101900033X

Munawar, & others. (2021). Analisis dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang 68 I Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata, 3(2), Mei 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36859/jdh.v3i1.562

Muqsith, M. A. (2020). UU Omnibus law yang Kontroversial. Adalah, 4(3), 109–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i3.17926

Naithani, P. (2022). Issues of Authorship and Ownership in Work created by Artificial Intelligence - Indian Copyright Law Perspective. NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management, 11(1).

Nomine, R. (2021). (On the history of the frankfurt draft of a german law for the protection of copyright in literary products and works of art /»frankfurter entwurf«/). Journal on European History of Law, 12(2), 2–28.

Ożegalska-Trybalska, J. (2020). Status of derivative works of scientific publications under copyright law and publication standards. Nowotwory, 70(3), 118–120. https://doi.org/10.5603/NJO.2020.0025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/NJO.2020.0025

Pitasari, R. A., & Munandar, A. I. (2020). Penolakan RUU Omnimbus Law di Kalangan Buruh: Sebuah Analisis Intelejen. Jurnal Litbang Polri, 23(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.46976/litbangpolri.v23i3.134

Rauch, G. (2023). The Swiss Federal Supreme Court’s Fire Ring Decision and the Evaluation of Works of Applied Art Under Copyright Law – A Burning Topic. GRUR International, 72(11), 1063–1067. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad101

Rohman, A. (2020). Sisi Positif dan Negatif Demonstrasi Pada Negara Demonstrasi Dimasa Pandemi. Jurnal Binamulia Hukum, 9(Desember 2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v9i2.125

Salami, E. (2021). AI-generated works and copyright law: Towards a union of strange bedfellows. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 16(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa189

Syafuddin, K. (2019). Komodifikasi Demo Tolak RKUHP Dan Revisi UU KPK Oleh Media Online Dalam Perspektif Society Of Spectacle. Jurnal Komuniti, 11(2), September 2019.

Szczepaniak, D. (2021). The Penal Provisions of the Polish Copyright Law of 1926 in Legislative Works and Judicial Practice: Overprint – Plagiarism – the Subjective Side – Penal Sanctions. Krakowskie Studia z Historii Panstwa i Prawa, 14(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.21.003.13270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.21.003.13270

UI, T. P. K. F. E. B., & UI, T. P. K. S. M. E. P. (2019). Di Balik Aksi Demonstrasi Mahasiswa: Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Perilaku Politik. Jurnal KSM Eka Prasetya UI, 1(1), Desember 2019.

Wiputhanupong, C. (2019). Making derivative works without authorisation and the interpretation of originality and creativity under Thailand’s copyright law. The Object and Purpose of Intellectual Property, 333–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789902495.00023

Yulia. (2023). Protection of Performers’ Rights in Indonesian Copyright Law: Copyrighted Works Uploaded to YouTube. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(2), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.1092.pp300-317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.1092.pp300-317