Penerapan Asas Lex Loci Contractus dan Lex Causae Terhadap Perkara IPB dan Amerika dalam Hukum Perdata Internasional

Lorena Andrea Putri; Afriyadi Budimansyah; Yoga D Pratama; Chesario Own.K; Maulina  Amalya

doi:10.47134/ijlj.v1i1.1984

Authors

Lorena Andrea Putri Universitas Pakuan Bogor
Afriyadi Budimansyah Universitas Pakuan Bogor
Yoga D Pratama Universitas Pakuan Bogor
Chesario Own.K Universitas Pakuan Bogor
Maulina Amalya Universitas Pakuan Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i1.1984

Keywords:

Law, International Agreement, Asas Lex Loci Contractus, Asas Lex Causae, Monkey

Abstract

Law is a unity formed to regulate everything something that happens in society. International law has 2 basic types, namely; Lex Loci Contractus Principle and Lex Loci Causae Principle. Normative writing method by searching library materials as well as reading material from sources related to the problem being studied. IPB case and America, namely regarding the delivery of 800 monkeys one of the monkeys' tail fell off and experienced postnatal stress, Finally, IPB doctors euthanized the baby monkey and paralyze the mother. Because of this incident, America filed a lawsuit against Indonesia regarding achievements in the form of reduction of 800 monkeys. Application of the Lex Loci Contractus Principle and Lex Causae is certainly effective, because it was proven during the process If the case is held, the law used meets the theory Legal Certainty, where Indonesian law is used in accordance with application of the principles in the existing agreement between IPB and America.

References

Arato, J. (2019). The Private Law Critique of International Investment Law. American Journal of International Law, 113(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.96 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.96

Firdaus. (n.d.). Kedudukan Hukum Internasional Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Nasional Indonesia. https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/fiat/article/download/285/243

FJP Law Office “Sekilas Penjelasan Terkait Hukum Perjanjian Internasional. (n.d.). https://fjp-law.com/id/sekilas-penjelasanterkait-hukum-perjanjian-internasional-law-of-treaties/diakses

Guillaume, F. (2019). Aspects of private international law related to blockchain transactions. Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and the Law, 49–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788115131.00009

Hardjowahono, B. S. (2000). Hukum Perdata Internasional, Buku Kesatu, Edisi Kelima. PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hartley, T. C. (2019). International Commercial Litigation: Text, Cases and Materials on Private International Law: Second Edition. International Commercial Litigation: Text, Cases and Materials on Private International Law, 1–894. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316155776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108774819

Karavias, M. (2018). Interactions between International Law and Private Fisheries Certification. Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000139

Lukas, C. (n.d.). Contoh Kasus Hukum Perdata Internasional. https://www.scribd.com/document/449244561/Contohkasus-Hukum-Perdata-Internasional

Lukianov, D. V. (2021). Prospects for recodification of private international law in ukraine: Do conflict-of-laws rules require a new haven? Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.37635/jnalsu.28(2).2021.198-210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37635/jnalsu.28(2).2021.198-210

Malik, A. (2020). Hukum Perdata Internasional: Pengertian, Sumber, Materi, dan Masalah-masalah Pokok. https://www.situshukum.com/2020/09/hukum-perdatainternasional.html

Mazalah Makalah “Kasus Hukum Perdata Internasional Tentang Kasus IPB Vs Amerika. (n.d.). https://mazalahmakalah.blogspot.com/2016/05/kasushukum-perdata-internasional.html

Mevorach, I. (2020). The Characterization of Pre-insolvency Proceedings in Private International Law. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(4), 855–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00176-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00176-x

Mills, A. (2018). Party Autonomy in Private International Law. Party Autonomy in Private International Law, 1–580. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139941419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139941419

Mora, P. (2018). Universal Civil Jurisdiction and Forum Necessitatis: The Confusion of Public and Private International Law in Naït-Liman v. Switzerland. Netherlands International Law Review, 65(2), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-018-0111-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-018-0111-z

Nukusheva, A. (2020). Transnational corporations in private international law: Do kazakhstan and russia have the potential to take the lead? Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(1), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.1(35) DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.1(35)

Pérez, A. F. (2018). Approximation to superior interest minor in private international law. Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, 50(151), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.2018.151.12291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.2018.151.12291

Pradnya, P. I. (n.d.). Hukum Perdata Internasional”. https://www.academia.edu/37923054/HUKUM_PERDATA_INTERNASIONAL

Rina T. (n.d.). Perkara IPB Vs. Amerika Serikat. https://www.scribd.com/document/396147048/PerkaraIPB-vs-Amerika-Serikat

Ruiz, Á. G. (2019). Reform of civil legislation on the legal status of animals and Private International Law. Derecho Animal, 10(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.428

Sullivan, D. (2018). The public/private distinction in international human rights law. Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives, 126–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315656571-16

van Wichelen, S. (2019). Moving Children through Private International Law: Institutions and the Enactment of Ethics. Law and Society Review, 53(3), 671–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12412