Application of UAVs and Remote Sensing Technologies for Atmospheric CO2 Capturing: A Study Application of UAVs and Remote Sensing in CO2 Reductions

Biplov Paneru; Bishwash Paneru; Ramhari Poudyal; Khem Poudyal

doi:10.47134/aero.v1i2.2508

Authors

Biplov Paneru Department of Electronics and Communication, Nepal Engineering College, Affiliated to Pokhara University, Bhaktapur, Nepal
Bishwash Paneru Department of Applied Science and Engineering, IOE Pulchowk Campus, Affiliated to Tribhuvan University, Lalitpur, Nepal
Ramhari Poudyal Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Purbanchal University, Nepal
Khem Poudyal Department of Applied Science and Engineering, IOE Pulchowk Campus, Affiliated to Tribhuvan University, Lalitpur, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/aero.v1i2.2508

Keywords:

Unarmed Vehicles, Drones, Remote Sensing, CO2 Capture, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Human activities are a major contributor to climate change, with rising levels of CO₂ in the atmosphere. To address this essential issue, several carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) methods have been developed. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and remote sensing technologies are emerging as major improvements to the efficiency and effectiveness of atmospheric carbon capture initiatives. This research examines the use of UAVs and remote sensing technologies to monitor, quantify, and manage atmospheric CO₂ levels. Furthermore, the study explores the broader implications of integrating robotic-drone technology, emphasizing their ability to contribute to a sustainable future. These technologies, which incorporate modern data collection and analysis methodologies, provide promising answers for both climate change mitigation and long-term environmental sustainability.

References

Bruening, J. (2023). Precise and unbiased biomass estimation from GEDI data and the US Forest Inventory. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1149153

Dziejarski, B., Krzyżyńska, R., & Andersson, K. (2023). Current status of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies in the global economy: A survey of technical assessment. Fuel, 342, 127776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127776

Eco Credits Limited, t/a More Trees by THG Eco. (2023). Why is carbon dioxide harmful to the environment? Retrieved from https://www.moretrees.eco/blogs/why-is-carbon-dioxide-harmful-to-the-environment

Gabrielli, P., Gazzani, M., & Mazzotti, M. (2020). The role of carbon capture and utilization, carbon capture and storage, and biomass to enable a net-zero-CO2 emissions chemical industry. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 59(15), 7033–7045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06579

He, L. (2023). The weekly cycle of photosynthesis in Europe reveals the negative impact of particulate pollution on ecosystem productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2306507120

Hemamalini, R. R., Vinodhini, R., Shanthini, B., Partheeban, P., Charumathy, M., & Cornelius, K. (2022). Air quality monitoring and forecasting using smart drones and recurrent neural network for sustainable development in Chennai city. Sustainable Cities and Society, 85, 104077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104077

Hong, X. (2023). Quantification and evaluation of atmospheric emissions from crop residue burning constrained by satellite observations in China during 2016–2020. Science of the Total Environment, 865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161237

Hou, Y. (2024). Coordinated effect of green expansion and carbon reduction: Evidence from sustainable development of resource-based cities in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119534

Hua, Y. (2023). Estimation of anthropogenic CO2 emissions at different scales for assessing SDG indicators: Method and application. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137547

IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change (Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P.,

Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P. R., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W., Péan, C., Pidcock, R., Connors, S., Matthews, J. B. R., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Gomis, M. I., Lonnoy, E., Maycock, T., Tignor, M., Waterfield, T., Eds.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.

Jiang, F. (2023). Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of synergizing the reduction of pollution and carbon emissions - Utilizing multi-source remote sensing data and GTWR model. Environmental Research, 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115775

Jiang, J. (2023). Developing an efficiency and energy-saving nitrogen management strategy for winter wheat based on the UAV multispectral imagery and machine learning algorithm. Precision Agriculture, 24(5), 2019–2043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10028-6

Kafy, A. A. (2023). Integrating forest cover change and carbon storage dynamics: Leveraging Google Earth Engine and InVEST model to inform conservation in hilly regions. Ecological Indicators, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110374

Kang, J. (2024). A novel geospatial machine learning approach to quantify non-linear effects of land use/land cover change (LULCC) on carbon dynamics. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.103712

Ko, K., Lee, J., & Chung, H. (2020). Highly efficient colorimetric CO2 sensors for monitoring CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage sites. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138786

Kuttippurath, J. (2023). A seasonal OH minimum region over the Indian Ocean? Indian Ocean OH minimum. Atmospheric Environment, 295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119536

Liu, X. (2023). Quantifying the spatiotemporal dynamics and impact factors of China’s county-level carbon emissions using ESTDA and spatial econometric models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137203

Liu, E., Lu, X., & Wang, D. (2023). A systematic review of carbon capture, utilization and storage: Status, progress and challenges. Energies, 16, 2865. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062865

Pramulya, R. (2023). Carbon Footprint Calculation of Net CO2 in Agroforestry and Agroindustry of Gayo Arabica Coffee, Indonesia. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, 16(2), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.54319/jjbs/160218

Tong, W., et al. (2019). Application research of satellite remote sensing technology in power system. In 2019 5th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), Beijing, China, pp. 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAR.2019.8813736

Wang, S. (2023). Evaluation and Implication of the Policies towards China’s Carbon Neutrality. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086762

Wang, Y. (2023). Remote Sensing Monitoring and Analysis of Spatiotemporal Changes in China’s Anthropogenic Carbon Emissions Based on XCO2 Data. Remote Sensing, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123207

Yang, Z. (2023). How accelerating the electrification of the van sector in Great Britain can deliver faster CO2 and NOx reductions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104300

Yao, P., Yu, Z., Zhang, Y., & Xu, T. (2023). Application of machine learning in carbon capture and storage: An in-depth insight from the perspective of geoscience. Fuel, 333, 126296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126296

Zhang, T., Zhang, W., Yang, R., Liu, Y., & Jafari, M. (2021). CO2 capture and storage monitoring based on remote sensing techniques: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124409