Kasus Potential Review pada Trainee Human Capital di Hotel XY Surabaya

Ida Wrycza; Diah Sofiah

doi:10.47134/pjp.v3i2.5525

Authors

Ida Maya Teresa Wrycza Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
Diah Sofiah Universitas 17 Agustus 1945

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/pjp.v3i2.5525

Keywords:

Asesmen, Trainee Human Capital, Potential Review, Psikologi, Sumber Daya Manusia

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan potential review terhadap seorang trainee Human Capital di Hotel X Surabaya sebagai bahan pertimbangan penempatan pada posisi Daily Worker. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan multimodal yang mengombinasikan metode tes dan non-tes, meliputi Behavioral Event Interview (BEI), tes intelegensi Intelligenz Struktur Test (IST), tes kepribadian Sixteen Personality Factors Questionnaire (16PF) dan PAPI Kostick, tes sikap kerja Kraeplin, serta tes grafis Draw-a-Person Test (DAP) dan Baum Tree Test. Analisis dilakukan secara integratif untuk memperoleh gambaran komprehensif mengenai aspek kognitif, sikap kerja, kepribadian, dan dinamika emosional subjek. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa subjek memiliki kemampuan kognitif pada tingkat sedang hingga tinggi pada fungsi-fungsi utama yang relevan dengan tuntutan pekerjaan administratif dan operasional Human Capital. Aspek sikap kerja menunjukkan kecepatan, ketelitian, dan ketahanan kerja yang baik, sementara profil kepribadian mengindikasikan kecenderungan bekerja secara mandiri, bertanggung jawab, dan menjaga hubungan kerja profesional. Terdapat satu area pengembangan pada aspek stabilitas emosi, namun tidak mengganggu pemenuhan kriteria inti jabatan. Berdasarkan analisis kesesuaian kompetensi menggunakan prinsip Just Noticeable Difference dari Weber’s Law, perbedaan kompetensi masih berada dalam batas toleransi yang dapat diterima. Dengan demikian, subjek disarankan untuk menempati posisi Daily Worker di Departemen Human Capital dengan catatan perlunya pendampingan dan penguatan pada aspek regulasi emosi dan komunikasi asertif.

References

Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970).

Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. (1998). The 16PF® Fifth Edition technical manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing (IPAT).

Dharmaraj, D. A., & Mohammed Sulaiman, I. (2015). Employee’s Perception of Potential Appraisal (A Study among Managerial Cadre Employees in Public Sectors in Kerala). Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 5(4), 155–161.

Dias, J., & Aylmer, S. (2019). Behavioral event interviewing as a strategic tool in competency-based assessment. Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(3), 45–58.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.

Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61968043

Handler, L., & Thomas, A. (2019). Drawings in assessment and psychotherapy: Research and application (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Hasibuan, Malayu S, (2013), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi, PT. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Hidayat, W. G., & Purnamaningsih, P. (2025). The impact of situational and behavioral event interviews on employee performance and productivity in ceramic companies. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 12(1), 505–518.

Huffcutt, A. I. (2011). An empirical review of the employment interview construct literature. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00529.x

Kontokosta, C. E., et al. (2022). Measuring sensitivity and tolerance using Weber–Fechner inspired methods: A case study on social distancing complaints. Scientific Reports, 12, Article.

Lück, H. E., & Timaeus, E. (2019). Lehrbuch der psychologischen Diagnostik (10th ed.). Beltz.

Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1503_02

McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331–339.

Miller, L. A., & Lovler, R. L. (2020). Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

OECD. (2023). Innovating assessments to measure and support complex skills (OECD Education Working Papers). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Palmucci, D. N. (2024). Decision making in human resources: Standard practices and cognitive influences. Emerging Markets Journal of Business, 19(4), 736–754.

Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the employment interview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320244000184

Saville & Holdsworth Ltd. (2008). PAPI: Personality and preference inventory manual. SHL Group Limited.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.

Schuler, H., Hell, B., & Trapmann, S. (2007). Personalauswahl und Eignungsdiagnostik (3rd ed.). Hogrefe.

Schuler, H., Hell, B., & Trapmann, S. (2016). Personnel selection and assessment: A handbook (2nd ed.). Routledge.

SHL Group. (2021). PAPI™ personality and preference inventory: Technical overview. SHL Group Ltd.

Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Standard setting methods in objective structured clinical examinations: Comparative study. (2024). ZUMS Edu Journal.

Scarffe, A., et al. (2024). Decision thresholds in medical decision-making: A systematic scoping review of non-expected utility thresholds.