Mengonseptualisasi Prinsip Meaningful Participation Melalui Kerangka Demokrasi Deliberatif Jürgen Habermas: Analisis terhadap Putusan MK No. 91/Puu-Xviii/2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v3i1.5097Keywords:
Jürgen Habermas, Democratic Deliberation, Meaningful ParticipationAbstract
This article aims to analyze the concept of public participation within Jürgen Habermas’s deliberative democracy framework by focusing on three fundamental rights: the right to be heard, the right to be considered, and the right to be given an explanation. These rights are examined as an integrated deliberative process that links the lifeworld, the public sphere, and the political system. Using a qualitative method with a theoretical approach, this study relies on an extensive literature review to interpret Habermasian deliberative democracy and to explain how citizens’ voices obtain normative legitimacy in democratic decision-making. The findings indicate that the right to be heard highlights the importance of acknowledging citizens’ lived experiences as a moral foundation for public policy. The right to be considered emphasizes the need for an inclusive, domination-free public sphere in which arguments are assessed on equal terms. Meanwhile, the right to be given an explanation underscores the political system’s responsibility to respond to public opinion communicatively rather than merely through formal procedures. The analysis concludes that public participation becomes substantively meaningful only when grounded in communicative rationality and protected from system colonization. Therefore, political legitimacy in modern democracy should not rest solely on procedural compliance but on rational dialogue formed between citizens and the state within a deliberative public sphere.
References
Seran. (2011). Teori Hukum Positif dalam Perspektif Etika Diskursus Jürgen Habermas. Universitas Atma Jaya.
Finlayson. (2005). abermas: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Bachtiar. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Unpas Press.
Ciravegna, M. (2023). Ubi Societas, Ibi Ius: The Legal System. Dalam S. Palmisano & N. Pannofino (Ed.), Damanhur (hlm. 75–96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10137-3_4
Cohen, J., & Sabel, C. (1997). Directly‐Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3(4), 313–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00034
Budi Hardiman. (2019). Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif: Ilmu, Masyarakat, Politik, Dan Postmoderenisme Menurut Jurgen Habermas, (4 ed.). Kansiusi.
Budi Hardiman. (2021). Demokrasi Deliberatif, Menimbang Negara Hukum, dan ruang publik dalam teori diskurusu jurgen habermas. kansius.
Firdaus, F. R., Chandra, R. L., & Sagala, C. S. T. (2024). Meaningful Participation as People’s Sovereignty Form in Democratic Rule of Law State. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 31(2), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss2.art5
Hendrawan, D., & Adinda S., A. J. (2025). Elemen-Elemen Demokrasi dalam Pemikiran Jürgen Habermas. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 8(2), 344–356. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v8i2.91412
Ivkovic, M. (2010). Habermas’ concept of systemic colonization of lifeworld. Sociologija, 52(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1001001I
Junaenah, I., Yunus, A. S. M., & Hashim, N. (2022). Adequacy of Public Information for Meaningful E-Participation in Policy-Making. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 6(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v6i2.32420
Putra & Durohim Amnan. (2024). Redefinisi Makna Partisipasi Publik Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora, 2(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v2i2.797
Marxsen, C. (2019). Discourse theory of law in times of populism. European Law Journal, 25(5), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12343
Noor, I. (2016). IDENTITAS AGAMA, RUANG PUBLIK DAN POST-SEKULARISME: PERSPEKTIF DISKURSUS JURGEN HABERMAS. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin, 11(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiu.v11i1.733
Nursetiawan, E., & Ardhanariswari, R. (2023). Meaningful Participation in Legislative Drafting as a Manifestation of a Democratic Rule of Law. Jambe Law Journal, 5(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.5.2.251-270
Ortega-Esquembre, C. (2021). De la teoría crítica de Habermas a la teoría discursiva del derecho y la democracia: Superando la dicotomía “sistema/mundo de la vida.” ENDOXA, 47. https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.47.2021.24293
Panjaitan, M. (2022). Applicability of Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation After The Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 17(2), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.36222
Marzuki. (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
Prastyo, A. (2022). LIMITATION OF MEANINGFUL PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS IN THE INDONESIAN LAW-MAKING PROCESS. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 11(3), 405. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.405-436
Prastyo, A. (2022b). LIMITATION OF MEANINGFUL PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS IN THE INDONESIAN LAW-MAKING PROCESS. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 11(3), 405. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.405-436
Pratama, N. A. (2022). MEANINGFUL PARTICIPATION SEBAGAI UPAYA KOMPROMI IDEE DES RECHT PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. CREPIDO, 4(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.4.2.137-147
Rizqi, A. R. (2022). Meaningful Participation in Local Regulation Making in Indonesia: A Study of Legislative Law. Rechtsidee, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.801
Soejono Soekanto. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Molise & D’Annunzio (2025). Deliberative democracy in Habermas. Sociology and Social Work Review, 9(1), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.58179/SSWR9111
Utami, P. (2025). Analisis Respons Publik di Media Sosial Terhadap Proses Legislasi RUU TNI Dalam Kerangka Demokrasi Deliberatif. Communicology: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(1), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.21009/COMM.034.09
Wardana, D. J., Sukardi, S., & Salman, R. (2023). Public Participation in the Law-Making Process in Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 30(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v30i1.14813
William Rehg. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press.
Windy Virdinia Putri, Gumilang Fuadi, & Nanik Prasetyoningsih. (2024). PREVENTING TOKENISM IN THE FORMATION OF LEGISLATION THROUGH MEANINGFUL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. Domus Legalis Cogitatio, 1(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.24002/dlc.v1i2.9907
Zakhour, S. (2020). The democratic legitimacy of public participation in planning: Contrasting optimistic, critical, and agnostic understandings. Planning Theory, 19(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219897404
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rahmat Mokodompit, Zamroni Abdussamad, Ahmad Ahmad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

