Konstruksi Hukum Pengawasan Internal terhadap Tindakan Koruptif Aparatur Sipil Negara (APIP): Studi Kasus Fee Proyek di Kementerian Pertanian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i4.4093Keywords:
Internal Oversight, Corrupt Practices, Civil Apparatus, Integrity AuditAbstract
This research examines the legal construction of internal supervision by the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) in tackling corrupt acts committed by the State Civil Apparatus (ASN), with a case study of project fees at the Ministry of Agriculture. Corruption in the bureaucracy, especially through the practice of project fees, shows the weakness of the internal control system, even though it has been regulated in regulations such as Government Regulation Number 60 of 2008 concerning the Government Internal Control System (SPIP) and Government Regulation Number 94 of 2021 concerning Civil Servant Discipline. Through a normative juridical approach and case studies, this research found a gap between legal norms and their implementation. APIP, as the main instrument of supervision, still faces challenges in terms of independence, competence, and adequate structural support. Cases in the Ministry of Agriculture show that supervisory actions are often reactive, not preventive. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the role of APIP through the adoption of integrity audit methodology (probity audit), human resource capacity building, and institutional reform in order to realize effective, independent, and accountable supervision. This research offers legal and institutional recommendations to strengthen clean and integrity governance.
References
Amin, M. (2018). Pengaruh Pengawasan Preventif dan Pengawasan Detektif terhadap Efektivitas Pengendalian Anggaran pada Inspektorat Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Economics Bosowa Journal, 4(001), 67–79. https://www.jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/menarailmu/article/viewFile/823/734
Damayanti, A. (2024). Tiga Pejabat Kementan Dicopot Karena Minta Fee Proyek. Detik Bali. https://www.detik.com/bali/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-7594018/tiga-pejabat-kementan-dicopot-karena-minta-fee-proyek.
Hilal, F., Irawan, R. A. I., Wati, I., & Nurhaliza. (2024). Peran Audit Internal (APIP) dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pengawasan dan Pencegahan Korupsi. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli (JSH), 7(2), 28–37.
KPK. (2025). Dorong Penguatan SDM APIP, KPK dan Lintas Kementerian/Lembaga Bergerak Bersama,” Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). KPK. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/ruang-informasi/berita/dorong-penguatan-sdm-apip-kpk-dan-lintas-kementerianlembaga-bergerak-bersama.
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum (13th ed.). Kencana.
Masdan, S. R., Ilat, V., & Pontoh, W. (2017). Analisis Kendala-kendala Peningkatan Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Gorontalo. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing “Goodwill,” 8(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.35800/jjs.v8i2.17780
Mengenal Probity Audit sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Korupsi. (2019). Inspektorat Madiun. Retrieved May 13, 2025, from https://inspektorat.madiunkota.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/PROBITY-AUDIT.pdf
Mentan Amran Copot Direktur di Kementan karena Ketahuan Main Mata dengan Calo. (2024). Kumparan Bisnis. https://kumparan.com/kumparanbisnis/mentan-amran-copot-direktur-di-kementan-karena-ketahuan-main-mata-dengan-calo-23UszIll5yQ/full
Nopirina. (2023). Urgent APIP in the Implementation of Bureaucracy Innovation to Establish quality of Maintenance Free of Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(9), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i9.5045
Prasetyo, T. H. (2023). Korupsi: Ancaman Tersembunyi Yang Merusak Sendi-Sendi Kehidupan Bangsa Dan Negara. Kementerian Keuangan, Dirjen Kekayaan Negara.
Ramadhan, M. S., & Adhim, C. (2021). Bagaimana Mengoptimalkan Kualitas Probity Audit? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 12(3), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2021.12.3.36
Siregar, P. B., Arisandi, M. R., & Puanandini, D. A. (2024). Efektivitas Penegak Hukum bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Civilia : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 3(2), 133–142.
Stiawan, S. P. A., & Wati, N. W. A. E. (2022). Pengaruh Independensi, Audit Tenure, Skeptisisme Profesional dan Beban Kerja terhadap Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Studi Kasus: Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Perwakilan Provinsi Bali). Hita Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 3(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32795/hak.v3i1.2280.
Suharto, D. (2021). PP 60 Tahun 2008 tentang SPIP, Perlukah Direvisi? Birokrat Menulis. Retrieved May 4, 2024, from https://birokratmenulis.org/pp-60-tahun-2008-tentang-spip-perlukah-direvisi/
Turnip, E. A. T. (2021). Peran APIP (Aparat Pengawas Internal Pemerintah) dalam Mendukung Penilaian Mandiri Pelaksanaan Reformasi Birokrasi (PMPRB) demi Terwujudnya Inovasi Birokrasi pada Sektor Publik. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. https://setkab.go.id/peran-apip-aparat-pengawas-internal-pemerintah-dalam-mendukung-penilaian-mandiri-pelaksanaan-reformasi-birokrasi-pmprb-demi-terwujudnya-inovasi-birokrasi-pada-sektor-publik/
Wati, F., Lubis, P. K. D., & Simanjuntak, U. A. M. K. S. (2024). Analisis Sistem Pengendalian Internal Berdasarkan Komponen COSO-Integrated Framework (Studi Kasus: Kantor Kelurahan Tanjung Mulia Hilir). SABER: Jurnal Teknik Informatika, Sains Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.59841/saber.v2i3.1281
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Linda Rahma Wati, Nurul Adzkia, Tania Putri Vianka, Sonia Ivana Barus, Iskandar Iskandar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
