Judicial Analysis of Law Enforcement Against Corruption In The Procurement of Goods and Services For Government Interest

Yanti Siahaan; July Esther; Debora

doi:10.47134/ijlj.v2i3.3613

Authors

Yanti Tiara Br Siahaan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas HKBP Nommensen
July Esther Fakultas Hukum, Universitas HKBP Nommensen
Debora Fakultas Hukum, Universitas HKBP Nommensen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i3.3613

Keywords:

Law Enforcement, Corruption Crime, Procurement of Goods and Services

Abstract

This study aims to Corruption in the procurement of goods and services is one of the most common corruption offences, ranking second only to gratuities/bribes. This is based on the World Bank (World Bank), every year more than 10 billion US dollars or around 85 trillion rupiah of the central government budget, both for routine expenditure and development projects, are spent through the procurement of goods and services. The purpose of this study is to find out the effectiveness of legal regulation of corruption offences in the procurement of goods and services for the benefit of the government and to find out to Overcome Obstacles in Law Enforcement of Corruption in the Procurement of Goods and Services for Government Interests so that Corruption Cases Can Decrease. The method used is a qualitative research method with descriptive analysis through legislative, case and conceptual approaches. The result of this research is that the formulation of minimum criminal punishment in Law Number 20 Year 2021 has shortcomings, namely not formulating sentencing guidelines to apply this minimum criminal punishment and efforts to overcome obstacles in law enforcement of corruption in the Procurement of Goods and Services so that the number of cases of Procurement of Goods and Services in the following year can decrease, including The principle of procurement must be carried out in tandem with enforcing integrity and increasing the professionalism of procurement human resources

References

ACLC KPK. Mencegah Korupsi Pada Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi-informasi/Eksplorasi/20240506-mencegah-korupsi-pada-pengadaan-barang-jasa.

Amiruddin (2010). Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Genta Publishing. Yogyakarta.

Dufour, G. K. (2023). The Relationship Between Victim Impact Statements and Judicial Decision Making: An Archival Analysis of Sentencing Outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 47(4), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000535

Esther, J. dkk (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Komite Sekolah Yang Menyalahgunakan Wewenang Sehingga Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama (Studi Putusan Nomor : 25/Pid.sus-TPK/2017/PN. Mdn). Jurnal Hukum PATIK.

Humas BPHN. Publikasi dan Data Statistik. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi-data/statistik/penindakan-2.

Humas BPHN. Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Turun Lagi, Penegakan Hukum Tipikor Perlu Dikaji Ulang. https://bphn.go.id/publikasi/berita/2023031603084646

Itjen KKP (2019). Manajemen Risiko dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Lingkungan KKP. Jakarta. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan.

Keppres Nomor 18 Tahun 2000 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/ Jasa Instansi Pemerintah

Kuchmenko, V. (2024). The Role of the Prosecutor’s Office in Legal Relations: Analysis of Functions and Impact on the Judicial System. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 69, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2024.7

Jap, S. (2015). Online Reverse Auctions: Issues, Themes and Prospects for the Future. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 30. 506–525.

Kaufmann, D (2005). Six Questions on the Cost of Corruption with World Bank Institute Global Governance Director Daniel Kaufmann. in: News: The World Bank. Washington, D.C.

Masudin, I. Aprilia, G. D., Nugraha, A., & Restuputri, D. P (2021). Impact of E-Procurement Adoption on Company Performance : Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Industry. Logistics. 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5010016

Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah

Peeters, M. (2020). Judicial Enforcement of Environmental Democracy: a Critical Analysis of Case Law on Access to Environmental Information in the European Union. Chinese Journal of Environmental Law, 4(1), 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1163/24686042-12340048

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. IKAPI. Bandung.

Sutedi, A. (2008). Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa dan Berbagai Permasalahannya. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Wibowo, R (2015). Mencegah Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Jasa (Apa yang Sudah dan yang Masih Harus Dilakukan?). Integritas, 37-60

Zhang, L. (2024). Judges’ reformulations in judicial interpretation in Chinese judgments: A comparative analysis. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 25(3), 392–418. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.21002.zha

Zhao, G. (2022). The influence of artificial intelligence technology judicial decision reasoning on contract performance in manufacturing supply chain: A simulation analysis using Evolutionary Game approach. Advances in Production Engineering And Management, 17(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2022.1.424