Tanggung Gugat Penyedia Layanan Terhadap Afiliator Terkait Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Afiliasi (Studi Kasus Afiliator Shopee Id: 11377610190)

Syirtu Fil  Laely; Muh Iman

doi:10.47134/ijlj.v1i2.2037

Authors

Syirtu Fil Laely Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
Muh Iman Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i2.2037

Keywords:

Liability Of Affiliate Services, Problems Of Non-Compliance With Affiliate Agreements, Case Study Of Shopee Affiliates

Abstract

The rapid development of internet technology influences online shopping activities through e-commerce, especially Shopee which has the Shopee Affiliate program. There are problems that often occur with Shopee Affiliates. One of them is that affiliates do not get full rights to the commission that was agreed upon at the beginning of the agreement. When the commission is not received in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement, Shopee can be held accountable. Therefore, this research is focused with the aim of finding out how liable service providers are to affiliates regarding non-performance in affiliate agreements on the Shopee application. The research method used by researchers is a legal research approach, namely legislation (statute approach), cases (case approach), and conceptual approach (conceptual approach) to help obtain data and information needs. In addition, this type of research design involves normative juridical research and is accompanied by the use of library study instruments as an alternative to collecting research supporting materials. Based on the results/findings of research on the problem of affiliate commission cases caused by an element of negligence or deliberate action on the part of Shopee as the organizer and service provider of the Shopee Affiliate program. so in this case, the affiliate of the Shopee Affiliate program who is disadvantaged has the right to file a lawsuit against Shopee who must be held accountable for the breach of contract that has been committed.

References

Allardyce, J. (2018). Association between schizophrenia-related polygenic liability and the occurrence and level of mood-incongruent psychotic symptoms in bipolar disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3485

Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2006). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Badrulzaman, M. D. (1994). Aneka Hukum Bisnis. Alumni.

Bonaventura, J. (2021). Pharmacological and behavioral divergence of ketamine enantiomers: implications for abuse liability. Molecular Psychiatry, 26(11), 6704–6722. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01093-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01093-2

Chan, G. C. K. (2021). Gateway or common liability? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of adolescent e-cigarette use and future smoking initiation. Addiction, 116(4), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15246

Chen, L. (2019). The international penetration of ibusiness firms: Network effects, liabilities of outsidership and country clout. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0176-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0176-2

Cohen, I. G. (2020). Potential Legal Liability for Withdrawing or Withholding Ventilators during COVID-19: Assessing the Risks and Identifying Needed Reforms. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 323(19), 1901–1902. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5442

Cooper, Z. D. (2018). Impact of co-administration of oxycodone and smoked cannabis on analgesia and abuse liability. Neuropsychopharmacology, 43(10), 2046–2055. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0011-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0011-2

Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M. (2020). Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: Investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms. Research Policy, 49(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104049

Guloksuz, S. (2019). Examining the independent and joint effects of molecular genetic liability and environmental exposures in schizophrenia: results from the EUGEI study. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20629

Hariri, W. M. (2011). Hukum Perikatan Dilengkapi Hukum Perikatan dalam Islam. CV. Pustaka Setia.

Hemby, S. E. (2019). Abuse liability and therapeutic potential of the Mitragyna speciosa (kratom) alkaloids mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine. Addiction Biology, 24(5), 874–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12639

Legge, S. E. (2019). Association of Genetic Liability to Psychotic Experiences with Neuropsychotic Disorders and Traits. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(12), 1256–1265. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2508

Li, J. (2019). The liability of opaqueness: State ownership and the likelihood of deal completion in international acquisitions by Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 40(2), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2985

Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Prenada Media Group.

Muhammad, A. (1992). Perjanjian Baku Dalam Praktek Perusahaan Perdagangan. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Onifade, M. (2020). Spontaneous combustion liability between coal seams: A thermogravimetric study. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 30(5), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.03.006

Price, W. N. (2019). Potential Liability for Physicians Using Artificial Intelligence. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 322(18), 1765–1766. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.15064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.15064

Purwadi, A. (2017). Prinsip Praduga Selalu Bertanggung Gugat dalam Sengketa Medik. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(7), 106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n1.a6

Ramli, A. M. (2004). Cyber Law dan HAKI dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Refika Aditama.

Redjeki, S., & Slamet. (2013). Tuntutan Ganti Rugi dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Suatu Perbandingan dengan Wanprestasi. Jurnal Lex Jurnalica, 10(2), 114.

Romer, A. L. (2018). Structural alterations within cerebellar circuitry are associated with general liability for common mental disorders. Molecular Psychiatry, 23(4), 1084–1090. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.57 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.57

Sinaga, A. I. J. (2022). Keabsahan Sistem Affiliate Pada Program Shopee Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Kuhperdata.

Sinaga, N. A., & Darwis, N. (2020). Non-kinerja dan Konsekuensinya dalam Implementasi Perjanjian. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 7(2), 51.

Subekti. (2003). Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata. Intermasa.

Sullivan, H. R. (2019). Are current tort liability doctrines adequate for addressing injury caused by AI? AMA Journal of Ethics, 21(2), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.160

Taeihagh, A. (2019). Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1494640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1494640

Warmadewa, I. M. A., & Udiana, I. M. (2017). Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Baku. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 4(3), 5.

Widjaja, & others. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Terhadap Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Dan Benda-Benda Yang Akan Ada Didalamnya Yang Berupa Toko. Jurnal Mercatoria, 13(2), 115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v13i2.3741

Wijayanti, R. A. F. D. (2022). Keabsahan Perjanjian Dalam Program Shopee Affiliate.