Strategi Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) Kabupaten Jember dalam Persiapan Pemilu Tahun 2024

Khafid Arsya; Putri Robiatul  Adawiyah

doi:10.47134/bai.v1i1.2049

Authors

Khafid Arsya Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
Putri Robiatul Adawiyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/bai.v1i1.2049

Keywords:

Strategy, KPU, General Election, Supporting and Inhibiting Factors

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out what strategies have been prepared by the General Election Commission (KPU) of Jember Regency in preparing for the upcoming 2024 elections. In addition, this study also aims to determine the factors that support and also factors that hinder the implementation of the strategy that has been prepared by the General Election Commission (KPU) of Jember Regency. The method used is a descriptive qualitative method. In this study, several informants were interviewed in order to obtain valid data. The results of this study indicate that: The General Election Commission (KPU) of Jember Regency already has a strategic plan that will take effect from 2020 to 2024, and the strategy that has been made by the Jember Regency KPU is divided into 2 (two) strategies, the first strategy is based on the strengths and opportunities possessed by the Jember Regency KPU, the two strategies are based on the weaknesses and threats possessed by the Jember Regency KPU. There are 2 (two) supporting factors owned by the Jember Regency KPU, namely, the first human resource factor that supports carrying out the KPU strategy, the second is facilities and infrastructure, and there are approximately 10 inhibiting factors which also pose a threat to the KPU in carrying out the strategy.

References

Bernardez-Rodal, A. (2022). Radical right parties and anti-feminist speech on Instagram: Vox and the 2019 Spanish general election. Party Politics, 28(2), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820968839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820968839

Chiaramonte, A. (2018). Populist Success in a Hung Parliament: The 2018 General Election in Italy. South European Society and Politics, 23(4), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2018.1506513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2018.1506513

Cottrell, D. (2018). An exploration of Donald Trump’s allegations of massive voter fraud in the 2016 General Election. Electoral Studies, 51, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.002

Cowley, P. (2018). The British General Election of 2017. The British General Election of 2017, 1–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95936-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95936-8_1

Cushion, S. (2018). Newspapers, Impartiality and Television News: Intermedia agenda-setting during the 2015 UK General Election campaign. Journalism Studies, 19(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1171163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1171163

Cutts, D. (2020). Brexit, the 2019 General Election and the Realignment of British Politics. Political Quarterly, 91(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12815

Dr.Mukhtar, Mp. (2013). Metode Praktis Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif.

Fernandes, J. (2020). The 2019 Portuguese general elections. West European Politics, 43(4), 1038–1050. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1702301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1702301

Fernquist, J. (2018). Political bots and the swedish general election. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, ISI 2018, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2018.8587347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2018.8587347

Hobolt, S. B. (2018). Brexit and the 2017 UK General Election. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12751

Indonesia, P. R. (2017). UU no.7 2019 Pemilu Serentak. http://rumahpemilu.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/UU-No.7-Tahun-2017-tentang-Pemilu.pdf

Johnston, R. (2018). Geographies of Brexit and its aftermath: voting in England at the 2016 referendum and the 2017 general election. Space and Polity, 22(2), 162–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2018.1486349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2018.1486349

Kalla, J. L. (2018). The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000363

López-García, G. (2018). Electoral debates. The last stronghold against mediatization? A case study of the 2015 Spanish general elections. Palabra Clave, 21(3), 772–797. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.3.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.3.6

Marsh, M. (2022). None of that Post-modern Stuff around Here: Grassroots Campaigning in the 2002 Irish General Election. BRITISH ELECTIONS and PARTIES REVIEW: VOLUME 14, 14, 245–267. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012970-16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012970-16

Mellon, J. (2018). Brexit or corbyn? Campaign and inter-election vote switching in the 2017 UK general election. Parliamentary Affairs, 71(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy001

Morissan. (2005). Hukum tata negara RI era reformasi. Ramdina Prakarsa.

Pemerintah. (2011). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 15 tahun 2011 tentang penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum. Gradien Mediatama.

RAKHA, K. M. (2023). STRATEGI KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM DALAM MENINGKATKAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT PADA PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu …, 6(1), 38–47. http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/70573

RI, K. (2021). Struktur Organisasi KPU RI. https://www.kpu.go.id/

Sharma, A. (2020). Sentimental Analysis of Twitter Data with respect to General Elections in India. Procedia Computer Science, 173, 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.038

Siswanto, E. (2017). Konflik Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Jember Tahun 2015. Jurnal Politico, 17(2), 286–312.

Sturgis, P. (2018). An assessment of the causes of the errors in the 2015 UK general election opinion polls. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 181(3), 757–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12329

Tjiptono, F. (2012). Pemasaran Strategik Edisi 2. CV. ANDI OFFSET.

Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J. (2019). Selfies, Policies, or Votes? Political Party Use of Instagram in the 2015 and 2016 Spanish General Elections. Social Media and Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119826129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119826129

Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J. (2020). The Baskerville’s dog suddenly started barking: voting for VOX in the 2019 Spanish general elections. Political Research Exchange, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2020.1781543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2020.1781543

Whiteley, P. (2019). Oh Jeremy Corbyn! Why did Labour Party membership soar after the 2015 general election? British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118815408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118815408

Wicaksono, I. (2017). Peran Partai Politik Dalam Partisipasi Dan Aspirasi Politik. Jurnal Politico, 15(1), 165–175. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/196255896.pdf

Wicaksono, I., & Yunifar, S. (2017). Perbandingan Rekrutmen Partai Politik terhadap Cabup dan Cawabup Pilkada Kabupaten Jember 2015. Prosiding Strengthening Local. http://jurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/pslcf/article/download/897/711

Zaenab, S., & Hadiati Salisah, N. (2020). Strategi Komunikasi Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) Kabupaten Bangkalan dalam Meningkatkan Partisipasi Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 9(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.15642/jik.2019.9.1.51-68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/jik.2019.9.1.51-68