Strategi Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) Kabupaten Jember dalam Persiapan Pemilu Tahun 2024


  • Khafid Arsya Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
  • Putri Robiatul Adawiyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember



Strategy, KPU, General Election, Supporting and Inhibiting Factors


The purpose of this research is to find out what strategies have been prepared by the General Election Commission (KPU) of Jember Regency in preparing for the upcoming 2024 elections. In addition, this study also aims to determine the factors that support and also factors that hinder the implementation of the strategy that has been prepared by the General Election Commission (KPU) of Jember Regency. The method used is a descriptive qualitative method. In this study, several informants were interviewed in order to obtain valid data. The results of this study indicate that: The General Election Commission (KPU) of Jember Regency already has a strategic plan that will take effect from 2020 to 2024, and the strategy that has been made by the Jember Regency KPU is divided into 2 (two) strategies, the first strategy is based on the strengths and opportunities possessed by the Jember Regency KPU, the two strategies are based on the weaknesses and threats possessed by the Jember Regency KPU. There are 2 (two) supporting factors owned by the Jember Regency KPU, namely, the first human resource factor that supports carrying out the KPU strategy, the second is facilities and infrastructure, and there are approximately 10 inhibiting factors which also pose a threat to the KPU in carrying out the strategy.


Bernardez-Rodal, A. (2022). Radical right parties and anti-feminist speech on Instagram: Vox and the 2019 Spanish general election. Party Politics, 28(2), 272–283. DOI:

Chiaramonte, A. (2018). Populist Success in a Hung Parliament: The 2018 General Election in Italy. South European Society and Politics, 23(4), 479–501. DOI:

Cottrell, D. (2018). An exploration of Donald Trump’s allegations of massive voter fraud in the 2016 General Election. Electoral Studies, 51, 123–142. DOI:

Cowley, P. (2018). The British General Election of 2017. The British General Election of 2017, 1–570. DOI:

Cushion, S. (2018). Newspapers, Impartiality and Television News: Intermedia agenda-setting during the 2015 UK General Election campaign. Journalism Studies, 19(2), 162–181. DOI:

Cutts, D. (2020). Brexit, the 2019 General Election and the Realignment of British Politics. Political Quarterly, 91(1), 7–23. DOI:

Dr.Mukhtar, Mp. (2013). Metode Praktis Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif.

Fernandes, J. (2020). The 2019 Portuguese general elections. West European Politics, 43(4), 1038–1050. DOI:

Fernquist, J. (2018). Political bots and the swedish general election. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, ISI 2018, 124–129. DOI:

Hobolt, S. B. (2018). Brexit and the 2017 UK General Election. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56, 39–50. DOI:

Indonesia, P. R. (2017). UU no.7 2019 Pemilu Serentak.

Johnston, R. (2018). Geographies of Brexit and its aftermath: voting in England at the 2016 referendum and the 2017 general election. Space and Polity, 22(2), 162–187. DOI:

Kalla, J. L. (2018). The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 148–166. DOI:

López-García, G. (2018). Electoral debates. The last stronghold against mediatization? A case study of the 2015 Spanish general elections. Palabra Clave, 21(3), 772–797. DOI:

Marsh, M. (2022). None of that Post-modern Stuff around Here: Grassroots Campaigning in the 2002 Irish General Election. BRITISH ELECTIONS and PARTIES REVIEW: VOLUME 14, 14, 245–267. DOI:

Mellon, J. (2018). Brexit or corbyn? Campaign and inter-election vote switching in the 2017 UK general election. Parliamentary Affairs, 71(4), 719–737. DOI:

Morissan. (2005). Hukum tata negara RI era reformasi. Ramdina Prakarsa.

Pemerintah. (2011). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 15 tahun 2011 tentang penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum. Gradien Mediatama.


RI, K. (2021). Struktur Organisasi KPU RI.

Sharma, A. (2020). Sentimental Analysis of Twitter Data with respect to General Elections in India. Procedia Computer Science, 173, 325–334. DOI:

Siswanto, E. (2017). Konflik Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Jember Tahun 2015. Jurnal Politico, 17(2), 286–312.

Sturgis, P. (2018). An assessment of the causes of the errors in the 2015 UK general election opinion polls. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 181(3), 757–781. DOI:

Tjiptono, F. (2012). Pemasaran Strategik Edisi 2. CV. ANDI OFFSET.

Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J. (2019). Selfies, Policies, or Votes? Political Party Use of Instagram in the 2015 and 2016 Spanish General Elections. Social Media and Society, 5(2). DOI:

Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J. (2020). The Baskerville’s dog suddenly started barking: voting for VOX in the 2019 Spanish general elections. Political Research Exchange, 2(1). DOI:

Whiteley, P. (2019). Oh Jeremy Corbyn! Why did Labour Party membership soar after the 2015 general election? British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(1), 80–98. DOI:

Wicaksono, I. (2017). Peran Partai Politik Dalam Partisipasi Dan Aspirasi Politik. Jurnal Politico, 15(1), 165–175.

Wicaksono, I., & Yunifar, S. (2017). Perbandingan Rekrutmen Partai Politik terhadap Cabup dan Cawabup Pilkada Kabupaten Jember 2015. Prosiding Strengthening Local.

Zaenab, S., & Hadiati Salisah, N. (2020). Strategi Komunikasi Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) Kabupaten Bangkalan dalam Meningkatkan Partisipasi Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 9(1), 51–68. DOI:




How to Cite

Arsya, K., & Adawiyah, P. R. (2023). Strategi Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) Kabupaten Jember dalam Persiapan Pemilu Tahun 2024. Buletin Antropologi Indonesia, 1(1), 14.