Psychological Characteristics of the Development of Analytical Thinking in Adolescents

Ashrapov Nodirbek Namoz ugli

doi:10.47134/pjp.v2i4.4460

Authors

Ashrapov Nodirbek Namoz ugli Bukhara State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/pjp.v2i4.4460

Keywords:

Adolescents, Analytical Thinking, Psychological Characteristics, Cognitive Development, Emotional State, Motivation, Self-Management

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the psychological characteristics that influence the development of analytical thinking during adolescence. Specifically, it examines how emotional stability, self-awareness, intellectual engagement, and educational environments contribute to the growth of adolescents’ analytical thinking. The research employs a mixed-methods approach: quantitative methods include surveys, intelligence tests, and psychological scales, while qualitative data are collected through observations, interviews, and focus group discussions. Statistical analysis was conducted on factors such as emotional resilience, critical thinking skills, and the use of interactive methods in classrooms. The results reveal that emotional stability and self-awareness have significant impacts on adolescents’ analytical abilities. Moreover, intellectual activity, social support, and the regular use of interactive teaching methods were found to strongly enhance cognitive and analytical development. The findings suggest that a comprehensive and individualized pedagogical strategy—one that integrates psychological support, digital tools, and collaborative learning—is essential for fostering analytical thinking in adolescents.

References

Anderson, R. C., & Fincham, J. M. (2021). Cognitive flexibility and adolescent learning: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09545-4

Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. (2020). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.

Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education. 2001. – P. 289–325.

Ciarrochi, J., & Hayes, L. L. (2019). The development of psychological flexibility and resilience in adolescents. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 14, 110–120.

Dweck, C. S. (2020). Mindset: The new psychology of success (Updated ed.). Ballantine Books.

Elmore, R. F. (2022). The future of learning: Designing personalized education. Harvard Education Review, 92(2), 201–219.

Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (2021). Dynamic development of thinking and learning in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 36(3), 247–262.

Fullan, M. (2023). Deep learning: Engage the world, change the world. Corwin Press.

Gardner, Howard. Truth, beauty, and goodness reframed: Educating for the virtues in the 21st century. New York: Basic Books. 2011. – 158 p.

Gopnik, A. (2021). Adolescent exploration and reasoning: Why teenage brains excel at learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(5), 395–401.

Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2021). 10 mindframes for visible learning: Teaching for success. Routledge.

Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2020). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Implications for teaching. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(2), 75–83.

Kahneman, D. (2021). Noise: A flaw in human judgment. Little, Brown Spark.

Karabenick, S. A., & Zusho, A. (2020). Academic motivation and self-regulated learning in adolescence. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 45–58.

Kim, H., & Hodges, C. (2022). Strategies to promote analytical thinking in digital classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(1), 83–102.

Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2020). Learner-centered technology integration for critical thinking. TechTrends, 64, 21–31.

Lee, J., & Reeve, J. (2021). Teacher support and psychological need satisfaction in developing analytical thinking. Learning and Instruction, 72, 101–112.

Liu, M., & Wang, Z. (2020). Adolescent learners and cognitive load theory in analytical task design. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1125–1143.

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2022). Future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass. OECD Publishing.

Patricia A. Alexander and Michael P. Pressley. Metacognition and Reading. 2016. – 263 p.

Ritchhart, R. (2020). Cultures of thinking: The power of making thinking visible. Jossey-Bass.

Sobirovich, T. B. (2024). The national idea as a driving force behind ideospheric transformation in Uzbekistan: Exploring its implications and impact. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Technology (AJAST), 8(3), 170-176.

Turdiev, B. S. (2024). Balancing national and universal perspectives: the dialectical dynamics in society’s ideosphere. Asian Journal of Basic Science & Research, 6(3), 59-65.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2021). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 269–286

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2003). Educational psychology: A century of contributions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbum. – P. 132-140.

Асомова Р. З. Мотивация выбора профессии и ее динамика 2002. – 136 с.

Гозиев Э. Г. Общая психология. Учительское издательство - творческий дом полиграфии. Ташкент. 2013. – 160 с.

Стернберг, Роберт. Практический интеллект = Practical Intelligence in Everyday Life. ‒ СПб.: Питер, 2002. ‒ 272 с.

Хайдаров Ф.И., Халилова Н.И. “Общая психология” учебник. Ташкент, 2009. - 68 с.