Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Pekerja dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Outsourcing dan Omnibus Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v3i3.5752Keywords:
Constitutional Rights, Outsourcing, Constitutional Court, Omnibus Law, Labor ProtectionAbstract
This study aims to analyze the protection of workers’ constitutional rights in the Constitutional Court decisions regarding outsourcing and the Omnibus Law in Indonesia. The research focuses on outsourcing regulations, the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court, and the implications of its decisions for workers’ rights protection. This study employs normative legal research using statutory and case approaches through the analysis of legislation, constitutional provisions, and Constitutional Court decisions, particularly Decision Number 27/PUU-IX/2011 and Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023. The findings show that the Constitutional Court recognizes outsourcing as constitutionally valid as long as it does not violate workers’ constitutional rights, including fair treatment, job security, and decent working conditions as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The Court also emphasizes the application of the Transfer of Undertaking Protection of Employment (TUPE) principle to ensure the continuity of workers’ rights in outsourcing practices. Furthermore, the Omnibus Law increases labor flexibility, which potentially weakens workers’ protection and creates legal uncertainty. In conclusion, the Constitutional Court plays an important role in balancing economic interests with the protection of workers’ constitutional rights in Indonesia’s labor system.
References
Agustia, N. Y., N, F. N., & Hamdani, A. M. (2026). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Outsourcing dalam Praktik Perusahaan Pasca Undang-Undang No 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Cipta Kerja. 158, 1567–1576.
Ali, P. D. H. Z. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum (XII). Sinar Grafika.
Anjari, W. (2023). Metode penelitian hukum.
Ardelia, T. A., Hibahtillah, M. A., Imon, S. A., & Ningrum, G. P. (2024). Analisis Kedudukan Pekerja Outsourcing : Kajian Terhadap Putusan MK. 2(4), 284–290.
Arvinda Ceniorita Lalang, Heru Christianto, jannes Bastian, W. L. O. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif.
Azzahra, D. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum atas Pembatasan Pekerja Outsourcing dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Tahun 2023. 4(1), 1–8.
Bila, A. N. (2025). Kajian Hukum Perlindungan Hak-hak Pekerja Outsourcing Menurut UU Nomor 6 Tahun 2023. 254–261.
Budiyono, T. (2021). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TENAGA KERJA KONTRAK DAN OUTSOURCING , SERTA PROBLEMATIKA IMPLEMENTASINYA. 5(April), 145–160.
Daniel Samaan, Ekkehard Ernst, M. S. (2023). World employment and social outlook : trends 2023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54394/SNCP1637
Devryano. (2022). HAK MENDAPATKAN PEKERJAAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TENAGA KERJA PENYANDANG DISABILITAS. 7(2), 138–155.
Endry Loman, Dr. Andari Yurikosari, S.H., M. H. (Corresponding. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Pada Perusahaan Outsourcing Dengan Status Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Yang Dipekerjakan Pada Pekerjaan Inti Perusahaan Endry Loman A . Latar Belakang Hukum perburuhan memiliki posisi yang unik , pada dasarnya hukum perb. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 3, 533–556.
Farelita, F., & Warka, M. (2025). Media Hukum Indonesia ( MHI ) Rasio Legis Pengaturan Pekerja Outsourcing dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Media Hukum Indonesia ( MHI ). 4(1), 750–757.
Fathoni, M. J. (2018). Muhammad Johar : Transfer of Undertakings TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS PROTECTION OF EMPLOYMENT ( TUPE ) DALAM PERJANJIAN OUTSOURCING. 1(2). https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v1i2.8834
Firyalfatin. (2026). Revisi UU Ketenagakerjaan, Momentum Hapus Sistem Outsourcing. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/revisi-uu-ketenagakerjaan--momentum-hapus-sistem-outsourcing-lt69b3b26d1be93/
Habibi, N., Amrizal, M. D. R., Rozikin, I. S., & Ahmad, I. F. (2024). Memperkuat Perlindungan Pekerja Outsourcing : Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan. 1(1).
Hajon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia Philipus M. Hadjon (xxiii). Surabaya Bina Ilmu 1987.
Hasudungan, A. M. (2012). Kemenangan Buruh Outsourcing (?) di Ruang Sidang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Lk2fhui.Law.Ui.Ac.Id. https://lk2fhui.law.ui.ac.id/kemenangan-buruh-outsourcing-di-ruang-sidang-mahkamah-konstitusi/
Klausul, I., & Pailit, J. (2021). Notaire. 4(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v4i1.24844
Kurniasari, T. W. (2022). KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN PEKERJA OUTSOURCING PASCA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA LEGAL CERTAINTY ON THE PROTECTION OF OUTSOURCING WORKERS AFTER LAW NUMBER 11 OF 2020 CONCERNING JOB CREATION. 05(02), 123–136.
Kurniawati, I. D., Prabowo, R. A., & Nabila, I. A. (2025). Sistem Outsourcing dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Hak Normatif Pekerja Dalam Sudut Pandang Hukum Perburuhan di Indonesia. 5(2024), 38937–38943.
Mamudji, S. S. S. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat 2019 (VI). Rajawali Pers.
Niko Wijaya, G. L. (2025). Implikasi Perubahan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Undang Undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Sistem Outsourcing. 4(1), 947–955.
Nunung Nurhasanah, E. H. (2025). Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora ( AJSH ) Implementasi Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja terhadap Outsourcing. 5(3).
Pranoto, T. W., Mbunai, L. O., Bahari, S., Suparman, Y., & Indonesia, U. S. (2025). Pengaturan outsourcing pasca undang-undang nomor 6 tahun 2023 dan putusan mahkamah konstitusi nomor 168/puu-xxi/2023. 2(02), 12–23.
Pratama, R. A., Teguh, G., Ristya, F., & Faudina, R. I. (2026). Implikasi Hukum Penolakan Buruh terhadap Sistem Outsourcing Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. 808–817.
Pratista, M. J. (2024). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Peran Perusahaan Outsourcing Dalam Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Tenaga Kerja Di Indonesia. 6(2), 7573–7580.
Prof. Dr. Jimly Asshiddiqie, S. H. (2010). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia (2nd ed.). Sinar Grafika. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=QXtWEAAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false
Prof. Dr. Mahmud Marzuki. (2005). Penelitian Hukum (Suwito (ed.); 13th ed.). PT Kharisma Putra Utama.
Ramadhan, N. I. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Pada Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor Dalam Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Karyawan ( PHK ). 1, 1–10.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/A_Theory_of_Justice.html?id=b7GZr5Btp30C&redir_esc=y
Rr. Winarti Pudji Lestari, M. A. (2023). LEGAL PROTECTION OF OUTSOURCING WORKERS FROM TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT UNDER LAW NUMBER 6 OF 2023 (PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEKERJA OUTSOURCING DARI PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2023). 11(6). https://jurnal.ulb.ac.id/index.php/advokasi/article/viewFile/4029/3998
Setiadi, M. P. (2025). Legal Certainty in Employment Termination Protection for Permanent Workers in Outsourcing Companies: An Analysis of Industrial Relations Court Decision No. 267/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst. 20(4). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1398
Setiawan, F. L. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Tenaga Kerja Outsourcing dalam Perjanjian Kerja Outsourcing. 4(2), 113–119.
Soewono, D. H. (2023). ASPEK HUKUM OUTSOURCING DALAM HUBUNGAN KERJA DI PERUSAHAAN : SUATU TANTANGAN GLOBAL MENUJU TERCIPTANYA HUBUNGAN KEMITRAAN. 1–24.
Taruli, M. G., Wijayati, R. A., Sahala, H., & Sinaga, R. (2024). PENGATURAN PEKERJAAN ALIH DAYA PASCA BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2023. 10(2), 82–94.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Salsabila Hadi Aulia, Dedi Mulyadi, Camiliya Fakhriyah Garnita, Fina Asriani, Muhamad Fahri Mawardi, Muhammad Abhiansyah Damar Nagara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
