Reformulation of Corporate Criminal Liability for Environmental Pollution and Degradation in the Mining Sector in Indonesia

Authors

  • Rihat Hutabarat Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jcl.v3i3.1.5848

Keywords:

Corporate Criminal Liability, Environmental Pollution, Environmental Degradation, Mining, Corporate Culture, Strict Liability

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Indonesian positive law governing corporate criminal liability for environmental crimes arising from mining activities, assess the effectiveness of its enforcement, and formulate a more progressive and relevant reconstruction model. The research problem stems from the gap between legal norms, which have formally recognized corporations as subjects of criminal law, and law enforcement practices, which remain predominantly reliant on administrative and civil instruments. This research employs a normative-empirical legal method using statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. The data were analyzed qualitatively through descriptive-analytical, evaluative, comparative, and prescriptive stages. The findings indicate that the Law on Environmental Protection and Management has provided a legal basis for imposing criminal liability on corporations; however, its implementation remains weak due to the difficulties in proving corporate fault, the limited technical capacity of law enforcement officials, weak inter-agency coordination, and the strong influence of economic and political interests. A comparative analysis of the legal frameworks of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia demonstrates that the approaches of corporate culture, strict liability, and corrective additional criminal sanctions are more effective in holding corporations accountable. Accordingly, this study proposes a reconstruction of corporate criminal liability that positions the corporation as the principal offender through fault attribution based on corporate culture, the strengthening of strict liability for certain environmental offences, and the imposition of ecological restoration, concession disqualification, publication of judgments, and compliance monitorship. This model is expected to strengthen ecological justice, protect affected communities, and ensure environmental sustainability.

References

Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics (Book V). Cambridge University Press.

Aryaputra, M. I., et al. (2023). Arah kebijakan sistem pemidanaan bagi korporasi dalam KUHP nasional. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 52(2).

Australia. (1995). Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), Part 2.5 Division 12.

Australian Law Reform Commission. (2020). Corporate criminal responsibility (Report No. 136).

Indonesia. (2009). Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management.

Indonesia. (2020). Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Amendment to Law Number 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining.

Indonesia. (2023). Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code.

Liputan6. (2025, June). KLH menang gugatan, 2 perusahaan tambang nikel harus bayar ganti rugi ekologis Rp47,9 miliar. Liputan6.

Mill, J. S. (1979). Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing Company.

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Capaian PNBP sektor minerba tahun 2023. Directorate General of Mineral and Coal.

Mongabay Indonesia. (2024, October 14). Mahkamah Agung batalkan izin pakai kawasan hutan PT GKP di Wawonii. Mongabay Indonesia.

Nurhidayati, D. (2021). Penegakan hukum pidana lingkungan terhadap korporasi di Indonesia: Problematika dan solusi. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 7(2), 145–163.

Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2024, January 23). Ombudsman RI ungkap kondisi tambang Blok Mandiodo yang disetop karena kasus hukum [Official press release].

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.

Sanjaya, B., et al. (2020). Inkonsistensi pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di luar KUHP. Pandecta, 15(2).

Santosa, M. A., & Quina, M. (2021). Gerakan pembaruan hukum lingkungan Indonesia dan perwujudan tata kelola lingkungan yang baik dalam negara demokrasi. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 1(1), 23–54.

United Kingdom. (2007). Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (1998). Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters (Aarhus Convention).

U.S. Department of Justice. (2024). Evaluation of corporate compliance programs. Criminal Division.

WALHI. (2022). Catatan akhir tahun: Krisis lingkungan hidup Indonesia. WALHI Nasional.

WALHI Sulawesi Selatan, & Friends of the Earth Japan. (2023). Laporan investigasi dampak lingkungan PT Vale Indonesia di Sorowako.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Hutabarat, R. (2026). Reformulation of Corporate Criminal Liability for Environmental Pollution and Degradation in the Mining Sector in Indonesia. Journal Customary Law, 3(3.1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47134/jcl.v3i3.1.5848

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.