Reconstruction of Criminal Law Policy in Handling Corruption Crimes Based on Illicit Enrichment to Realize Just Recovery of State Assets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/jcl.v3i3.1.5831Keywords:
Reconstruction, Illicit Enrichment, Corruption, Asset Recovery, JusticeAbstract
This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of positive criminal law policies in handling corruption crimes against state asset recovery, examine the lack of illicit enrichment norms in the Indonesian criminal law system, and reconstruct a model of illicit enrichment-based criminal law policy through an integrative approach of prevention and enforcement to realize just state asset recovery. The study employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The outcomes indicate that Indonesian positive law is still oriented towards the follow-the-act paradigm, so that it has not optimally pursued the proceeds of crime, while the non-adoption of Article 20 UNCAC into national law has created a lack of norms regarding unexplained wealth as an independent offense. The novelty of this study lies in the reconstruction of an integrative model that connects LHKPN, PPATK, taxation, banking, and beneficial ownership tracing through the stages of clarification, audit, disproportionate wealth analysis, asset recovery mediation, litigation, and confiscation while still guaranteeing due process of law, human rights protection, and ultimum remedium. This model produces a formulation of ius constituendum in the form of an ideal norm of illicit enrichment as the missing link in a more effective and equitable Indonesian asset recovery policy.
References
Alhakim, A. a. (2019). Kebijakan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia.
Arliman, L. (2020). Mewujudkan Penegakan Hukum Yang Baik Untuk Mewujudkan Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum. Doctrinal, 509–519.
Fauzia, A. a. (2022). Pembaharuan Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Korporasi Melalui Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 497–519.
Hartanti, E. (2023). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sinar Grafika.
Jawa, D. P. (2024). Tantangan dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 1006–1017.
Kasih, E. (2018). Pelaksanaan prinsip-prinsip demokrasi dalam sistem politik di Indonesia guna mewujudkan keadilan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 49–68.
Mahmud, A. (2020). Urgensi Penegakan Hukum Progresif Untuk Mengembalikan Kerugian Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 256–271.
Muzaki, H. (2021). Illicit Enrichment dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurist-Diction, 122.
Putra, D. A. (2021). Tinjauan atas kriminalisasi illicit enrichment dalam tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia: studi perbandingan dengan Australia. Indonesia Criminal Law Review, 4.
Putri, N. N. (2021). Urgensi Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 38–61.
Sarudi. (2021). Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum. Widya Sandhi.
Ubaidila, A. S. (2023). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Illicit Enrichment Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pemulihan Aset Negara. Jambi: Universitas Jambi.
Ubaidila, A. S. (2024). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terkait Illicit Enrichment Sebagai Upaya Pemulihan Aset Negara. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 115–126.
Waluyo, B. (2022). Pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi: Strategi dan optimalisasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Yolanda, E. U. (2022). Pemidanaan pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 124–145.
Zenno, M. P. (2017). Penerapan Prinsip Ultimum Remedium Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 257–276.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asep Guntur Rahayu, Ahmad Redi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
