Analisis Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat terhadap Program Corporate Social Responsibility Garitan Kalongliud PT ANTAM (Persero) Tbk UBPE Pongkor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/jagpi.v3i1.5511Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Community Satisfaction Index, Community Empowerment, Program Evaluation, Post-Mining SustainabilityAbstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs in the mining sector play a strategic role in strengthening community resilience and supporting sustainable livelihoods, particularly in preparation for post-mining conditions. This study aims to analyze community satisfaction with the Garitan Kalongliud CSR Program implemented by PT ANTAM (Persero) Tbk UBPE Pongkor using the Community Satisfaction Index (CSI) as an evaluation framework. An evaluative mixed-methods approach was employed by integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were collected through a survey of 25 respondents selected purposively from 214 program beneficiaries, while qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis. The quantitative data were analyzed using CSI calculations, whereas qualitative findings were used to enrich the interpretation of community perceptions and program outcomes. The results indicate that the Garitan Kalongliud Program achieved a CSI score of 3.63, equivalent to a converted score of 90.82, placing it in the “Very Good” category. High community satisfaction was associated with the program’s relevance to local needs, active community participation, effective facilitation, and its positive economic, social, and environmental impacts. Beneficiaries also demonstrated strong readiness to continue program activities independently, indicating substantial sustainability potential beyond the mining period. These findings suggest that the Community Satisfaction Index is an effective instrument for evaluating CSR performance and can serve as a strategic basis for improving community empowerment, strengthening social license to operate, and supporting sustainable post-mining development.
References
Behringer, K., & Szegedi, K. (2016). The Role of CSR in Achieving Sustainable Development – Theoretical Approach. European Scientific Journal, 12(22), 10–22.
Boutilier, R. G. (2014). Frequently Asked Questions About the Social Licence to Operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.941141
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and Livelihoods: Whose Reality Counts? Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), 173–204.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Ife, J. (2013). Community Development in an Uncertain World: Vision, Analysis and Practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 14 Tahun 2017 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Survei Kepuasan Masyarakat Unit Penyelenggara Pelayanan Publik.
Moon, J. (2007). The Contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility to Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 296–306
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2019). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta
Sunaryo. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 44(1), 26–33.
Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). Social License to Operate. In P. Darling (Ed.), SME Mining Engineering Handbook.
UGM, S. (2025). Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat Program Garitan Kalongliud tahun 2025. Yogyakarta: SODEC UGM.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
